Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors of Pulmonary Zygomycosis versus Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Patients with Cancer

Open access
Chamilos, G., Marom, E. M., Lewis, R. E., Lionakis, M. S., Kontoyiannis, D. P.·2005·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary zygomycosis (PZ), an emerging mycosis among patients with cancer, has a clinical manifestation similar to that of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Most cases of PZ in such patients develop as breakthrough infections if treatment with antifungal agents effective against Aspergillus species is administered. However, clinical criteria to differentiate PZ from IPA are lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and computed tomography (CT) findings for 16 patients with cancer and PZ and for 29 contemporaneous patients with cancer and IPA at the time of infection onset (2002-2004). Patients with mixed infections were excluded. Parameters predictive of PZ by univariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Almost all patients with PZ (15 of 16) and IPA (28 of 29) had underlying hematological malignancies and typical risk factors for invasive mold infections. In logistic regression analysis of clinical characteristics, concomitant sinusitis (odds ratio [OR], 25.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-448.15; P = .026) and voriconazole prophylaxis (OR, 7.76; 95% CI, 1.32-45.53; P = .023) were significantly associated with PZ. The presence of multiple (> or = 10) nodules (OR, 19.8; 95% CI, 1.94-202.29; P = .012) and pleural effusion (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.06-24.23; P = .042) at the time that the patient underwent the initial CT were both independent predictors of PZ in the logistic regression analysis of radiological parameters. No difference occurred in the frequency of other CT findings suggestive of pulmonary mold infections (e.g., masses, cavities, halo sign, or air-crescent sign) between the 2 patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: PZ in immunocompromised patients with cancer could potentially be distinguished from IPA on the basis of clinical and radiological parameters; prospective validation is needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/430710

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Chamilos, G., Marom, E. M., Lewis, R. E., Lionakis, M. S., & Kontoyiannis, D. P.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
60-66
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2108791013
Cited by
369
References
1
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Pulmonary Zygomycosis versus Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Patients with Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/430710
The paper
Chamilos, G., Marom, E. M., Lewis, R. E., Lionakis, M. S., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2005). Predictors of Pulmonary Zygomycosis versus Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Patients with Cancer. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/430710

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.