Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context

Schlosser, Ann E.·2005·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

Two experiments examined public and private responding in a multiple-audience context—a context in which members have varying opinions. I propose and find that posters (those communicating their experience to others) are influenced only by another’s negative opinion because it triggers such social concerns as appearing indiscriminate. Consequently, they adjust their public attitudes downward. Self-presentational concerns appear to cause this negativity bias: lurkers (those not posting their opinion) were less affected by another’s negative opinion. Further-more, posters presented more than one side when publicly explaining their atti-tudes. These effects persisted despite posters ’ favorable product experiences and commitment to these attitudes. After patronizing a local restaurant, I visited City-search’s Web site to post my experience. I know that Citysearch attracts a diverse audience. How might this in-fluence the degree to which I incorporate others ’ reviews into my own? Past theorizing does not fully address the types of social pressures present in online group contexts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/432235

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Schlosser, A. E.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2005-09
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
260-265
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2121779059
Cited by
402
References
2
FWCI
14.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/432235
The paper
Schlosser, A. E. (2005). Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/432235

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.