Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Semianalytical Model of Galaxy Formation with High‐Resolution N‐Body Simulations

Open access
Kang, X., Jing, Y. P., Mo, H. J., Borner, G.·2005·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We model the galaxy formation in a series of high-resolution N -body simulations using the semianalytical approach. Unlike many earlier investigations based on semianalytical models, we make use of the subhalos resolved in the N -body simulations to follow the mergers of galaxies in dark halos, and we show that this is pivotal in modeling correctly the galaxy luminosity function at the bright end and the bimodal nature of galaxy color distribution. Mergers of galaxies based on subhalos also result in many more bright red galaxies at high z . The semianalytical model we adopt is similar to those used in earlier semianalytical studies, except that we consider the effect of a prolonged cooling in small halos and that we explicitly follow the chemical enrichment in the interstellar medium. We use our model to make predictions for the properties of the galaxy population at low redshift and compare them with various current observations. We find that our model predictions can match the luminosity functions of galaxies in various wavebands redder than the u band. The shape of the luminosity function at the bright end is well reproduced if galaxy mergers are modeled with the merger trees of subhalos, and the steep faint-end slope can be moderated if the gas cooling time in low-mass halos is comparable to the age of the universe. The model with subhalos resolved can reproduce the main features in the observed color bimodal distribution, although it still predicts too many bright blue galaxies. The same model can also match the color-magnitude relation for elliptical galaxies in clusters, the metallicity-luminosity relation and metallicity-rotation velocity relation of spiral galaxies, and the gas fraction in present-day spiral galaxies. We also identify areas where further improvements of the model are required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/432493

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Kang, X., Jing, Y. P., Mo, H. J., & Borner, G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2005-09-20
Volume
631
Issue
1
Pages
21-40
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2042540695
Cited by
217
References
2
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semianalytical Model of Galaxy Formation with High‐Resolution N‐Body Simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/432493
The paper
Kang, X., Jing, Y. P., Mo, H. J., & Borner, G. (2005). Semianalytical Model of Galaxy Formation with High‐Resolution N‐Body Simulations. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/432493

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.