The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Galaxy Morphologies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Dominance of Linear Structures at the Detection Limit
Open accessAbstract
Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (UDF) larger than 10 pixels (0 3) have been classified according to morphology, and their photometric properties are presented. There are 269 spiral, 100 elliptical, 114 chain, 126 double-clump, 97 tadpole, and 178 clump-cluster galaxies. We also cataloged 30 B -band and 13 V -band dropouts and calculated their star formation rates. Chains, doubles, and tadpoles dominate the other types at faint magnitudes. The fraction of obvious bars among spirals is ~10%, a factor of 2-3 lower than in other deep surveys. The distribution function of axial ratios for elliptical galaxies is similar to that seen locally, suggesting that ellipticals relaxed quickly to a standardized shape. The distribution of axial ratios for spiral galaxies is significantly different than locally, having a clear peak at ~0.55 instead of a nearly flat distribution. The falloff at small axial ratio occurs at a higher value than locally, indicating thicker disks by a factor of ~2. The falloff at high axial ratio could be from intrinsic triaxial shapes or selection effects. Inclined disks should be more highly sampled than face-on disks near the surface brightness limit of a survey. Simple models and data distributions demonstrate these effects. The decreased numbers of obvious spiral galaxies at high redshifts could be partly the result of surface brightness selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An almost head-on collision as the origin of two off-centre rings in the Andromeda galaxy
Block, D. L., Bournaud, F., Combes, F., Groess, R., Barmby, P., Ashby, M. L. N., Fazio, G. G., Pahre, M. A., & Willner, S. P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05184 · Cited by 132
Morpheus: A Deep Learning Framework for the Pixel-level Analysis of Astronomical Image Data
Hausen, R., & Robertson, B. E. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8868 · Cited by 110
Quantifying Non-parametric Structure of High-redshift Galaxies with Deep Learning
Tohill, C., Ferreira, L., Conselice, C. J., Bamford, S. P., & Ferrari, F. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac033c · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., Rubin, D. S., & Schaffer, M. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-09-20
- Volume
- 631
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-100
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2146330077
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Galaxy Morphologies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Dominance of Linear Structures at the Detection Limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/432502
- The paper
- Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., Rubin, D. S., & Schaffer, M. A. (2005). Galaxy Morphologies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Dominance of Linear Structures at the Detection Limit. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/432502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.