The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circumstellar Dust Disks in Taurus‐Auriga: The Submillimeter Perspective
Open accessAbstract
We present a sensitive, multiwavelength submillimeter continuum survey of 153 young stellar objects in the Taurus-Auriga star formation region. The submillimeter detection rate is 61% to a completeness limit of ~10 mJy (3 σ) at 850 μm. The inferred circumstellar disk masses are lognormally distributed with a mean mass of ~5 × 10 -3 M ☉ and a large dispersion (0.5 dex). Roughly one-third of the submillimeter sources have disk masses larger than the minimal nebula from which the solar system formed. The median disk-to-star mass ratio is 0.5%. The empirical behavior of the submillimeter continuum is best described as F ν ∝ ν 2.0±0.5 between 350 μm and 1.3 mm, which we argue is due to the combined effects of the fraction of optically thick emission and a flatter frequency behavior of the opacity compared to the interstellar medium. The latter effect could be due to a substantial population of large dust grains, which presumably would have grown through collisional agglomeration. In this sample, the only stellar property that is correlated with the outer disk is the presence of a companion. We find evidence for significant decreases in submillimeter flux densities, disk masses, and submillimeter continuum slopes along the canonical infrared spectral energy distribution evolution sequence for young stellar objects. The fraction of objects detected in the submillimeter is essentially identical to the fraction with excess near-infrared emission, suggesting that dust in the inner and outer disks is removed nearly simultaneously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamics of binary-disk interaction. 1: Resonances and disk gap sizes
Artymowicz, P., & Lubow, S. H. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/173679 · Cited by 1,317
Cited by
Protoplanetary Disks and Their Evolution
Williams, J. P., & Cieza, L. A. (2011) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102548 · Cited by 1,403
Self-citationProtoplanetary disk structures in Ophiuchus
Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & Dullemond, C. P. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1502 · Cited by 709
Self-citationA Major Asymmetric Dust Trap in a Transition Disk
van der Marel, N., van Dishoeck, E. F., Bruderer, S., Birnstiel, T., Pinilla, P., Dullemond, C. P., van Kempen, T. A., Schmalzl, M., Brown, J. M., Herczeg, G. J., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1236770 · Cited by 608
High‐Resolution Submillimeter Constraints on Circumstellar Disk Structure
Andrews, S. M., & Williams, J. P. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/511741 · Cited by 426
Self-citationA Reappraisal of The Habitability of Planets around M Dwarf Stars
Tarter, J. C., Backus, P. R., Mancinelli, R. L., Aurnou, J. M., Backman, D. E., Basri, G. S., Boss, A. P., Clarke, A., Deming, D., Doyle, L. R., et al. (2007) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2006.0124 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, S. M., & Williams, J. P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 631
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1134-1160
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2153970052
- Cited by
- 864
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circumstellar Dust Disks in Taurus‐Auriga: The Submillimeter Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/432712
- The paper
- Andrews, S. M., & Williams, J. P. (2005). Circumstellar Dust Disks in Taurus‐Auriga: The Submillimeter Perspective. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/432712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.