Cited by 467Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Mass-Loss Measurements from Astrospheric Lyα Absorption

Open access
Wood, B. E., Müller, H.-R., Zank, G. P., Linsky, J. L., Redfield, S.·2005·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Measurements of stellar mass-loss rates are used to assess how wind strength varies with coronal activity and age for solar-like stars. Mass loss generally increases with activity, but we find evidence that winds suddenly weaken at a certain activity threshold. Very active stars are often observed to have polar starspots, and we speculate that the magnetic field geometry associated with these spots may be inhibiting the winds. Our inferred mass-loss/age relation represents an empirical estimate of the history of the solar wind. This result is important for planetary studies as well as solar/stellar astronomy, since solar wind erosion may have played an important role in the evolution of planetary atmospheres.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/432716

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lallement R., 1992, A&A, 266, 479
  2. Petit, P., etal 2005, MNRAS, in press
  3. Wood B. E., 2004, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 1, 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Wood, B. E., Müller, H.-R., Zank, G. P., Linsky, J. L., & Redfield, S.
Affiliations
  • Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • McDonald Observatory (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2005-07-11
Volume
628
Issue
2
Pages
L143-L146
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1867591249
Cited by
467
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
15.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
stellar mass loss, Lyman-alpha absorption, stellar winds, coronal activity, solar-type stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review