Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,091

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Photometric Performance and Calibration of the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys

Open access
Sirianni, M., Jee, M. J., Benítez, N., Blakeslee, J. P., Martel, A. R., Meurer, G., Clampin, M., De Marchi, G., Ford, H. C., Gilliland, R., Hartig, G. F., Illingworth, G. D., Mack, J., McCann, W. J.·2005·Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Abstract

We present the photometric calibration of the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS). The ACS was installed in the Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) in 2002 March. It comprises three cameras: the Wide Field Channel (WFC), optimized for deep near‐IR survey imaging programs; the High Resolution Channel (HRC), a high‐resolution imager that fully samples the HST point‐spread function (PSF) in the visible; and the Solar Blind Channel (SBC), a far‐UV imager. A significant amount of data has been collected to characterize the on‐orbit performance of the three channels. We give here an overview of the performance and calibration of the two CCD cameras (WFC and HRC) and a description of the best techniques for reducing ACS CCD data. The overall performance is as expected from prelaunch testing of the camera. Surprises were a better‐than‐predicted sensitivity in the visible and near‐IR for both the WFC and HRC and an unpredicted dip in the HRC UV response at ∼3200 Å. On‐orbit observations of spectrophotometric standard stars have been used to revise the prelaunch estimate of the instrument response curves to best match predicted and observed count rates. Synthetic photometry has been used to determine zero points for all filters in three magnitude systems and to derive interstellar extinction values for the ACS photometric systems. Due to the CCD internal scattering of long‐wavelength photons, the width of the PSF increases significantly in the near‐IR, and the aperture correction for photometry with near‐IR filters depends on the spectral energy distribution of the source. We provide a detailed recipe to correct for the latter effect. Transformations between the ACS photometric systems and the UBVRI and WFPC2 systems are presented. In general, two sets of transformations are available: one based on the observation of two star clusters; the other on synthetic photometry. We discuss the accuracy of these transformations and their sensitivity to details of the spectra being transformed. Initial signs of detector degradation due to the HST radiative environment are already visible. We discuss the impact on the data in terms of dark rate increase, charge transfer inefficiency, and "hot" pixel population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/444553

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,091

Metadata

Authors
Sirianni, M., Jee, M. J., Benítez, N., Blakeslee, J. P., Martel, A. R., Meurer, G., Clampin, M., De Marchi, G., Ford, H. C., Gilliland, R., Hartig, G. F., Illingworth, G. D., Mack, J., & McCann, W. J.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Published
2005-10
Volume
117
Issue
836
Pages
1049-1112
ISSN
  • 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3873
OpenAlex
W2176131481
Cited by
1,091
References
0
FWCI
191.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Photometric Performance and Calibration of the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/444553
The paper
Sirianni, M., Jee, M. J., Benítez, N., Blakeslee, J. P., Martel, A. R., Meurer, G., Clampin, M., De Marchi, G., Ford, H. C., Gilliland, R., Hartig, G. F., Illingworth, G. D., Mack, J., & McCann, W. J. (2005). The Photometric Performance and Calibration of the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/444553

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.