Cited by 127Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Torment of Secrecy: Ethical and Epistemological Problems in the Study of Esoteric Traditions

Urban, Hugh B.·1998·History of Religions

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/463503

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–127 of 127

Metadata

Authors
Urban, H. B.
Corresponding author
Urban, Hugh B.
Venue
History of Religions
Published
1998-02
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
209-248
ISSN
  • 0018-2710 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6935
OpenAlex
W2079859560
Cited by
127
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
History of Religions (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
secrecy, esoteric traditions, research ethics, epistemology, insider information, religious studies methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review