Cited by 363

Entry Restrictions, Industry Evolution, and Dynamic Efficiency: Evidence From Commercial Banking

Jayaratne, Jith, Strahan, Philip E.·1998·The Journal of Law and Economics

Abstract

This article shows that bank performance improves significantly after restrictions on bank expansion are lifted. We find that operating costs and loan losses decrease sharply after states permit statewide branching and, to a lesser extent, after states allow interstate banking. The improvements following branching deregulation appear to occur because better banks grow at the expense of their less efficient rivals. By retarding the “natural” evolution of the industry, branching restrictions reduced the performance of the average banking asset. We also find that most of the reduction in banks' costs were passed along to bank borrowers in the form of lower loan rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/467390

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The U.S. bank branch deregulations intensified competition and triggered improvements in banking services, reducing loan interest rates, raising deposit rates, lowering overhead costs, spurring better screening and monitoring, and reducing bad loans.

    “The reforms intensified competition and triggered improvements in banking services, reducing interest rates on loans, raising them on deposits, lowering overhead costs, spurring the development of better techniques for screening and monitoring firms, and reducing the proportion of bad loans on the books of banks (Hubbard andPalia 1995, Jayaratne andStrahan 1998).”

    From Finance, Growth, and Inequality (2021) · cites this paper as Jayaratne and Strahan 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jayaratne, J., & Strahan, P. E.
Venue
The Journal of Law and Economics
Published
1998-04
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
239-274
ISSN
  • 0022-2186
  • 1537-5285
Cited by
363
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review