The Binding of Yamm: A New Edition of the Ugaritic Text KTU 1.83
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars usually call KTU 1.83 a myth or mythological, though some also link it to incantation.
“Most authors describe this text as a”
From Image of the Dragon in RS 16.266 (= KTU1–3 1.83) (2021) · cites this paper as Pitard 1998: 273
Parker, Pitard, Dijkstra, Tropper, and Wyatt support taking the {y}s as vocatives.
“Interpretation of these {y}s as vocative is now supported by Parker (1997: 192); Pitard (1998: 278); Dijkstra (1999: 152); Tropper (2000Tropper ( /2012: 318 [ §54.221b]: 318 [ §54.221b]); and Wyatt (1998/2002: 369 n. 10).”
From Image of the Dragon in RS 16.266 (= KTU1–3 1.83) (2021) · cites this paper as Pitard 1998: 278
The {y} elements in these forms almost must be interpreted as vocative particles.
“these {y}s almost must be interpreted as vocative particles.”
From Image of the Dragon in RS 16.266 (= KTU1–3 1.83) (2021) · cites this paper as Pitard 1998: 266
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Image of the Dragon in RS 16.266 (= KTU1–3 1.83)
Richey, M. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0381
- Authors
- Pitard, W. T.
- Corresponding author
- Pitard, Wayne T.
- Venue
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 261-280
- ISSN
- 0022-2968 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6978
- OpenAlex
- W1984508500
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Keywords
- Ugaritic texts, Ugaritic mythology, textual edition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
