The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbiological Features of Vancomycin in the 21st Century: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Creep, Bactericidal/Static Activity, and Applied Breakpoints to Predict Clinical Outcomes or Detect Resistant Strains
Abstract
The results of vancomycin susceptibility tests document that the drug continues to have activity against a wide variety of gram-positive pathogens. The subsequent emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci, the persistent failure of vancomycin therapy against strains tested as susceptible, and the more recent discoveries of vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains have compromised the use of vancomycin. Although analyses of surveillance studies fail to demonstrate "minimum inhibitory concentration creep" among populations of wild-type enterococci, streptococci, or staphylococci, enterococci with acquired resistance to vancomycin continue to evolve. The dominantly used automated commercial tests poorly recognize vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus isolates, which necessitates the use of expensive supplemental screening tests. Monitoring for appropriate serum levels of vancomycin and determinations of the bactericidal activity of vancomycin appear to best predict clinical outcome, thus creating additional diagnostic burdens for clinical laboratories. Improvements in current test methods with breakpoint criteria and expanded use of the vancomycin bactericidal assays to detect "tolerant" strains will be required to increase the value of vancomycin treatment or to refocus therapy toward the use of newer, alternative agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Infection with Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Containing the vanA Resistance Gene
Chang, S., Sievert, D. M., Hageman, J. C., Boulton, M. L., Tenover, F. C., Downes, F. P., Shah, S., Rudrik, J. T., Pupp, G. R., Brown, W. J., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa025025 · Cited by 1,095
Structure, biochemistry and mechanism of action of glycopeptide antibiotics
Reynolds, P. E. (1989) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/bf01967563 · Cited by 699
Wootton, M. (2001) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/47.4.399 · Cited by 414
Cited by
Rybak, M., Lomaestro, B., Rotschafer, J. C., Moellering, R., Craig, W., Billeter, M., Dalovisio, J. R., & Levine, D. P. (2009) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp080434 · Cited by 1,795
Howden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
Antibiotic resistance and persistence—implications for human health and treatment perspectives
Huemer, M., Mairpady Shambat, S., Brugger, S. D., & Zinkernagel, A. S. (2020) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202051034 · Cited by 850
van Hal, S. J., Lodise, T. P., & Paterson, D. L. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir935 · Cited by 512
Kullar, R., Davis, S. L., Levine, D. P., & Rybak, M. J. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir124 · Cited by 463
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. N.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- S13-S24
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2135044274
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiological Features of Vancomycin in the 21st Century: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Creep, Bactericidal/Static Activity, and Applied Breakpoints to Predict Clinical Outcomes or Detect Resistant Strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/491710
- The paper
- Jones, R. N. (2006). Microbiological Features of Vancomycin in the 21st Century: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Creep, Bactericidal/Static Activity, and Applied Breakpoints to Predict Clinical Outcomes or Detect Resistant Strains. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/491710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.