Cited by 1,465Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsGender, Health, and Social Inequality

From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid Reproductive Labor

Glenn, Evelyn Nakano·1992·Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/494777

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glenn, E. N.
Corresponding author
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano
Venue
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
Published
1992-10
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
1-43
ISSN
  • 0097-9740 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6943
OpenAlex
W2011978323
Cited by
1,465
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 40
FWCI
41.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
racial division of labor, servitude, service sector employment, reproductive labor, racial inequality, labor history, domestic work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review