Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 501

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the Submillimeter Opacity of Protoplanetary Disks

Open access
Draine, B. T.·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Solid particles with the composition of interstellar dust and power-law size distribution dn / da ∝ a - p (for a ≤ a max with a max ≳ 3λ and 3 < p < 4) will have submillimeter opacity spectral index β(λ) ≡ d ln κ/ d ln ν ≈ ( p - 3)β ISM , where β ISM ≈ 1.7 is the opacity spectral index of interstellar dust material in the Rayleigh limit. For the power-law index p ≈ 3.5, which characterizes interstellar dust and may apply for particles growing by agglomeration in protoplanetary disks, grain growth to sizes a ≳ 3 mm will result in β(1 mm) ≲ 1. Grain growth can naturally account for β ≈ 1 observed for protoplanetary disks, provided that a max ≳ 3λ.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/498130

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 501

Metadata

Authors
Draine, B. T.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-01-10
Volume
636
Issue
2
Pages
1114-1120
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2083224201
Cited by
501
References
0
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Submillimeter Opacity of Protoplanetary Disks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/498130
The paper
Draine, B. T. (2006). On the Submillimeter Opacity of Protoplanetary Disks. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/498130

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.