The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative Designs and the Evolution of Functional Diversity
Abstract
According to conventional wisdom, functional diversity is exclusively a consequence of species having evolved adaptations to fill different niches within a heterogeneous environment. This view anticipates only one optimal combination of trait values in a given environment, but it is also conceivable that alternative designs of equal fitness in the same environment might evolve. To investigate that possibility, we use a genetic algorithm to search for optimal combinations of 34 functional traits in a realistic model of tree seedling growth and survival. We show that separate lineages of seedlings evolving in identical environments result in many alternative functional designs of approximately equal fitness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770 · cited 2×
“…adaptation have mentioned the idea that alternative designs might be fit in the same environment for a long time (Bock 1959, 1976, 1980; Lewontin 1978; Gould and Lewontin 1979; Mayr 1983; Gould 1989; Parker and Maynard Smith 1990; Körner 1991; Losos and Miles 1994; Niklas 1997b; Gutschick 1999).”
BackgroundMechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Cited by
Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Amatangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V. T., Godoy, O., Hobbie, S. E., Hoorens, B., Kurokawa, H., Pérez‐Harguindeguy, N., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x · Cited by 2,855
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., & Kembel, S. W. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x · Cited by 2,321
The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology
Violle, C., Enquist, B. J., McGill, B. J., Jiang, L., Albert, C. H., Hulshof, C., Jung, V., & Messier, J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014 · Cited by 1,768
Evolution, the Extended Synthesis
(2010) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262513678.001.0001 · Cited by 964
Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities
Bruelheide, H., Dengler, J., Purschke, O., Lenoir, J., Jiménez-Alfaro, B., Hennekens, S. M., Botta-Dukát, Z., Chytrý, M., Field, R., Jansen, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0699-8 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, C. O., & Lechowicz, M. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-66
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2044714978
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative Designs and the Evolution of Functional Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/498276
- The paper
- Marks, C. O., & Lechowicz, M. J. (2006). Alternative Designs and the Evolution of Functional Diversity. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/498276
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
