The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Globalization and Postcolonial States
Abstract
The experiences of two programs aimed at poor rural women in India suggest that postcolonial contexts might give us reason to reconsider commonly accepted characterizations of neoliberal states. An anthropological approach to the state differs from that of other disciplines by according centrality to the meanings of the everyday practices of bureaucracies and their relation to representations of the state. Such a perspective is strengthened when it integrates those meanings with political economic, social structural, and institutional approaches. Although the two programs examined here originated in different time periods (one before and the other after neoliberal reforms) and embodied very different ideologies and goals (the earlier one being a welfare program that provided tangible services and assets and the later one an empowerment program aimed at helping rural women to become autonomous rather than dependent clients of the state waiting for the redistribution of resources), they were surprisingly alike in some of their daily practices. In a postcolonial context with high rates of poverty and a neoliberal economy with high rates of growth, what we witness is not the end of welfare and its replacement with workfare but the simultaneous expansion of both kinds of programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-6408 · Cited by 14,307
The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. J. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,178
(2005) · Cited by 9,479
Church, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Government Information · doi:10.1016/s1352-0237(01)00307-0 · Cited by 9,153
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim210040063 · Cited by 8,972
Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Fukuyama, F., & Scott, J. C. (1998) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048980 · Cited by 8,396
Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400820740 · Cited by 7,106
Governmentality: power and rule in modern society
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6521 · Cited by 6,205
Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nonetti, R. Y. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7 · Cited by 5,580
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408
Cited by
Hydraulic City: Water and the Infrastructures of Citizenship in Mumbai
Anand, N. (2017) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822373599 · Cited by 803
Beyond NGO‐ization?: Reflections from Latin America
Alvarez, S. E. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1057/dev.2009.23 · Cited by 375
Creative Heritage: Palestinian Heritage NGOs and Defiant Arts of Government
De Cesari, C. (2010) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01280.x · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, A., & Sharma, A.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-307
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W1496041703
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 37.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Globalization and Postcolonial States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/499549
- The paper
- Gupta, A., & Sharma, A. (2006). Globalization and Postcolonial States. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/499549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.