Human Health Implications of Salmonella-Contaminated Natural Pet Treats and Raw Pet Food
Abstract
Human salmonellosis occurs mainly as a result of handling or consuming contaminated food products, with a small percentage of cases being related to other, less well-defined exposures, such as contact with companion animals and natural pet treats. The increasing popularity of raw food diets for companion animals is another potential pet-associated source of Salmonella organisms; however, no confirmed cases of human salmonellosis have been associated with these diets. Pets that consume contaminated pet treats and raw food diets can be colonized with Salmonella organisms without exhibiting clinical signs, making them a possible hidden source of contamination in the household. Pet owners can reduce their risk of acquiring Salmonella organisms by not feeding natural pet treats and raw food diets to their pets, whereas individuals who investigate cases of salmonellosis or interpret surveillance data should be aware of these possible sources of Salmonella organisms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contact with pets has been identified as a route or risk factor for human salmonellosis in several case reports and studies.
“However, contact with pets has also been identified as a route or a risk factor for human salmonellosis in several case reports and studies (Finley et al. 2006, Domingues et al. 2012, Freeman et al. 2013), indicating that pets which have consumed Salmonella‐contaminated feed also pose an infection risk to owners.”
From Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards. (2019) · cites this paper as Finley et al. 2006
Researchers sampling raw pet foods from commercial outlets have commonly noted that package warnings about preparation and hygienic handling are absent.
“It has been noted by researchers sampling raw pet foods from commercial outlets that package warnings about preparation and hygienic handling of these pet foods are commonly absent (Finley et al. 2006, Strohmeyer et al. 2006, Mehlenbacher et al. 2012, Bojanic et al. 2017, van Bree et al. 2018) and that packaging may be defective and leaky (Bojanic et al. 2017).”
From Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards. (2019) · cites this paper as Finley et al. 2006
Pets that have consumed Salmonella-contaminated feed pose an infection risk to owners.
“However, contact with pets has also been identified as a route or a risk factor for human salmonellosis in several case reports and studies (Finley et al. 2006, Domingues et al. 2012, Freeman et al. 2013), indicating that pets which have consumed Salmonella‐contaminated feed also pose an infection risk to owners.”
From Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards. (2019) · cites this paper as Finley et al. 2006
Human clinical disease associated with exposure to raw-fed pets and their food is likely to occur as sporadic and isolated cases rather than in outbreaks.
“However, human clinical disease associated with exposure to raw‐fed pets and their food is likely to occur as sporadic and isolated cases rather than in outbreaks.”
From Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards. (2019) · cites this paper as Finley et al. 2006
Such cases typically will not feature prominently, or at all, in public health reports, unless in the context of a wider outbreak.
“Therefore, such cases typically will not feature prominently, or at all, in public health reports (Finley et al. 2006, American Veterinary Medical Association 2012), unless in the context of a wider outbreak (CDC 2018a).”
From Raw diets for dogs and cats: a review, with particular reference to microbiological hazards. (2019) · cites this paper as Finley et al. 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 28 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Finley, R., Reid-Smith, R., Weese, J. S., & Angulo, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
- Ontario Veterinary College (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Finley, R.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 686-691
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2166869826
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Keywords
- Salmonella, human salmonellosis, raw pet food, companion animals, zoonotic transmission
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Food Microbiology, Humans, Salmonella Infections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review