The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Study of the Relationship Between Environmental Contamination with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and Patients' Acquisition of MRSA
Abstract
Objective.: The study aimed to examine the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) in the environment and its relationship to patients' acquisition of MRSA. Design.: A prospective study was conducted in a 9-bed intensive care unit for 14 months. At every environmental screening, samples were obtained from the same 4 sites in each bed space. Patients were screened at admission and then 3 times weekly. All environmental and patient strains were typed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Results.: MRSA was isolated from the environment at every environmental screening, when both small and large numbers of patients were colonized. Detailed epidemiological typing of 250 environmental and 139 patient isolates revealed 14 different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles, with variants of EMRSA-15 being the predominant type. On only 20 (35.7%) of 56 occasions were the strains isolated from the patients and the strains isolated from their immediate environment indistinguishable. There was strong evidence to suggest that 3 of 26 patients who acquired MRSA while in the intensive care unit acquired MRSA from the environment. Conclusions.: This study reveals widespread contamination of the hospital environment with MRSA, highlights the complexities of the problem of contamination, and confirms the need for more-effective cleaning of the hospital environment to eliminate MRSA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
David, M. Z., & Daum, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00081-09 · Cited by 1,972
Nseir, S., Blazejewski, C., Lubret, R., Wallet, F., Courcol, R., & Durocher, A. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03420.x · Cited by 273
Alfa, M. J., Lo, E., Olson, N., MacRae, M., & Buelow-Smith, L. (2015) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.016 · Cited by 59
Engelbrecht, K., Ambrose, D., Sifuentes, L., Gerba, C., Weart, I., & Koenig, D. (2013) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.017 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardy, K. J., Oppenheim, B. A., Gossain, S., Gao, F., & Hawkey, P. M.
- Venue
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-132
- ISSN
- 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-6834
- OpenAlex
- W2089583468
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of the Relationship Between Environmental Contamination with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and Patients' Acquisition of MRSA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/500622
- The paper
- Hardy, K. J., Oppenheim, B. A., Gossain, S., Gao, F., & Hawkey, P. M. (2006). A Study of the Relationship Between Environmental Contamination with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and Patients' Acquisition of MRSA. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1086/500622
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.