The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Compliance With Hand Hygiene in Hospitals
Open accessAbstract
Hand hygiene prevents cross-infection in hospitals, but compliance with recommended instructions often is poor among healthcare workers. Although some previous interventions to improve compliance have been successful, none has achieved lasting improvement. This article reviews reported barriers to appropriate hand hygiene and factors associated with poor compliance. Easy access to hand hygiene in a timely fashion and the availability of skin-care lotion both appear to be necessary pre-requisites for appropriate hand-hygiene behavior. In particular, in high-demand situations, hand rub with an alcohol-based solution appears to be the only alternative that allows a decent compliance. The hand-hygiene compliance level does not rely on individual factors alone, and the same can be said for its promotion. Because of the complexity of the process of change, it is not surprising that solo interventions often fail, and multimodal, multidisciplinary strategies are necessary. A framework that includes parameters to be considered for hand-hygiene promotion is proposed, based on epidemiologically driven evidence and review of the current knowledge. Strategies for promotion in hospitals should include reasons for noncompliance with recommendations at individual, group, and institutional levels. Potential tools for change should address each of these elements and consider their interactivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care
Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14546-1 · Cited by 4,531
Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene
Pittet, D., Hugonnet, S., Harbarth, S., Mourouga, P., Sauvan, V., Touveneau, S., & Perneger, T. V. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02814-2 · Cited by 2,524
Self-citationGuideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings
Boyce, J. M., & Pittet, D. (2002) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1067/mic.2002.130391 · Cited by 2,120
Self-citationHand hygiene and patient care: pursuing the Semmelweis legacy
Pittet, D., & Boyce, J. M. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(09)70295-6 · Cited by 323
Self-citationBehavioural considerations for hand hygiene practices: the basic building blocks
Whitby, M., Pessoa-Silva, C. L., McLaws, M.-L., Allegranzi, B., Sax, H., Larson, E., Seto, W. H., Donaldson, L., & Pittet, D. (2007) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.09.026 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pittet, D.
- Venue
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 381-386
- ISSN
- 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-6834
- OpenAlex
- W2118701329
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Compliance With Hand Hygiene in Hospitals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/501777
- The paper
- Pittet, D. (2000). Improving Compliance With Hand Hygiene in Hospitals. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1086/501777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.