The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Hospital Employees: Prevalence, Duration, and Transmission to Households
Abstract
Objective: To assess the prevalence and duration of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) carriage among hospital employees and transmission to their households. Design: A point-prevalence survey of MRSA carriage (nasal swabbing) of staff and patients throughout the hospital; a prevalence survey of MRSA carriage in 2 medical wards, with carriers observed to estimate carriage duration; and evaluation of transmission to MRSA-positive workers' families. All MRSA isolates were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. During the study, no MRSA outbreak was detected among hospitalized patients. Setting: A 600-bed, public tertiary-care teaching hospital near Paris. Results: Sixty MRSA carriers were identified among 965 healthcare providers (prevalence, 6.2%; CL,, 4.7%-7.7%). Prevalence was higher in staff from clinical wards than from elsewhere (9.0% vs 2.1%;P< .0001). Identity of isolates from employees and patients varied from 25% in medical wards to 100% in the long-term-care facility. MRSA carriage was identified in 14 employees from 2 medical wards (prevalence, 19.4%; CI 95, 10.3%-28.5%). Prevalence depended on the length of service in these wards. Transmission to households was investigated in 10 MRSA-positive workers' families and was found in 4. All isolates from each family were identical. Conclusions: Few data are available concerning the prevalence of MRSA carriers among hospital employees in the absence of an outbreak among patients. MRSA transmission between patients and employees likely depends on the frequency and duration of exposure to MRSA-positive patients and infection control measures employed. Frequent transmission of MRSA from colonized healthcare workers to their households was documented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lindenmayer, J. M., Schoenfeld, S., O'Grady, R., & Carney, J. K. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.8.895 · Cited by 298
Charlebois, E. D., Bangsberg, D. R., Moss, N. J., Moore, M. R., Moss, A. R., Chambers, H. F., & Perdreau-Remington, F. (2002) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/338069 · Cited by 245
Cited by
David, M. Z., & Daum, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00081-09 · Cited by 1,972
Jones, T. F., Creech, C. B., Erwin, P., Baird, S. G., Woron, A. M., & Schaffner, W. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/503265 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Eveillard, M., Martin, Y., Hidri, N., Boussougant, Y., & Joly-Guillou, M.-L.
- Venue
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 114-120
- ISSN
- 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-6834
- OpenAlex
- W2041981028
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Hospital Employees: Prevalence, Duration, and Transmission to Households. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/502360
- The paper
- Eveillard, M., Martin, Y., Hidri, N., Boussougant, Y., & Joly-Guillou, M.-L. (2004). Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Hospital Employees: Prevalence, Duration, and Transmission to Households. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1086/502360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.