Cited by 98Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsInfection Control in Healthcare

Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to Preterm Infants Through Breast Milk

Behari, Priya, Englund, Janet, Alcasid, Grace, Garcia-Houchins, Sylvia, Weber, Stephen G.·2004·Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective To determine a potential source of MRSA colonization and infection among preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using molecular analysis of breast milk samples. Design Case report, outbreak investigation. Results Preterm triplets were delivered at 26 weeks' gestation via cesarean section when routine active surveillance for MRSA was performed for all infants in a NICU. Surveillance consisted of swabbing the throat, nose, and umbilicus (TNU) weekly. Although infants A and B initially had negative TNU swabs, repeat cultures were positive for MRSA on day of life (DOL) 10 and DOL 18, respectively. Surveillance and clinical cultures for infant C were negative. Infant A developed sepsis, and multiple blood cultures were positive for MRSA beginning on DOL 14. Infant B developed conjunctivitis and a conjunctival exudate culture was positive for MRSA on DOL 70. Both infants were fed breast milk via nasogastric tube. Cultures of breast milk samples for infants A and B dated prior to either infant's first positive surveillance culture were positive for MRSA. All MRSA isolates had identical results on antibiotic susceptibility testing. PFGE demonstrated identical banding patterns for the MRSA isolates from the blood culture of infant A, breast milk for infants A and B, and a surveillance swab from infant B. At no time did the mother develop evidence of mastitis or other local breast infection. Conclusions MRSA can be passed from mother to preterm infant throug…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/502476

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behari, P., Englund, J., Alcasid, G., Garcia-Houchins, S., & Weber, S. G.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Weber, Stephen G.
Venue
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Published
2004-09
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
778-780
ISSN
  • 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-6834
OpenAlex
W2010797925
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, breast milk transmission, preterm infants, neonatal intensive care unit, MRSA colonization, sepsis, conjunctivitis, nosocomial infections, outbreak investigation, triplets, active surveillance, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing, antibiotic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Chicago, Disease Outbreaks, Diseases in Twins, DNA, Bacterial, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Milk, Human, Staphylococcal Infections, Triplets, Methicillin Resistance, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review