The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force
Abstract
Summary: The Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings provides health-care workers (HCWs) with a review of data regarding handwashing and hand antisepsis in health-care settings. In addition, it provides specific recommendations to promote improved hand-hygiene practices and reduce transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and personnel in health-care settings. This report reviews studies published since the 1985 CDC guideline (Garner JS, Favero MS. CDC guideline for handwashing and hospital environmental control, 1985.Infect Control 1986;7:231-43) and the 1995 APIC guideline (Larson EL, APIC Guidelines Committee. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings.Am J Infect Control 1995;23:251-69) were issued and provides an in-depth review of hand-hygiene practices of HCWs, levels of adherence of personnel to recommended handwashing practices, and factors adversely affecting adherence. New studies of the in vivo efficacy of alcohol-based hand rubs and the low incidence of dermatitis associated with their use are reviewed. Recent studies demonstrating the value of multidisciplinary hand-hygiene promotion programs and the potential role of alcohol-based hand rubs in improving hand-hygiene practices are summarized. Recommendations concerning related issues (e.g., the use of surgical hand antiseptics, hand lotions or creams, and wearing of artificial fingernails) are also included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene
Pittet, D., Hugonnet, S., Harbarth, S., Mourouga, P., Sauvan, V., Touveneau, S., & Perneger, T. V. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02814-2 · Cited by 2,524 · cited 8×
“Other studies established that sustained improvements in handwashing behavior occurred during a long-term program to improve adherence to hand-hygiene policies.(74)-(75) Factors Affecting Adherence.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRoberts, L., PhD, E., Smith, W., Jorm, L., PhD, B., Patel, M., Douglas, R. M., & McGilchrist, C. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.105.4.738 · Cited by 205
Cited by
Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections
O'Grady, N. P., Alexander, M., Burns, L. A., Dellinger, E. P., Garland, J., Heard, S. O., Lipsett, P. A., Masur, H., Mermel, L. A., Pearson, M. L., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003 · Cited by 1,066
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy – what we know and what we don’t
Cieplik, F., Deng, D., Crielaard, W., Buchalla, W., Hellwig, E., Al-Ahmad, A., & Maisch, T. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040841x.2018.1467876 · Cited by 902
Effect of hand hygiene on infectious disease risk in the community setting: a meta-analysis
Aiello, A. E., Coulborn, R. M., Perez, V., & Larson, E. L. (2008) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.124610 · Cited by 796
Why healthcare workers don't wash their hands: a behavioral explanation
Whitby, M., McLaws, M.-L., & Ross, M. W. (2006) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/503335 · Cited by 363
Golin, A. P., Choi, D., & Ghahary, A. (2020) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.182 · Cited by 298
Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses
SICKBERTBENNETT, E., WEBER, D., GERGENTEAGUE, M., SOBSEY, M., SAMSA, G., & RUTALA, W. (2005) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.005 · Cited by 187
Disinfection, sterilization, and antisepsis: An overview
Rutala, W. A., & Weber, D. J. (2019) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.018 · Cited by 136
Jensen, D. A., Danyluk, M. D., Harris, L. J., & Schaffner, D. W. (2015) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-14-245 · Cited by 64
Water temperature as a factor in handwashing efficacy
Michaels, B., Gangar, V., Schultz, A., Arenas, M., Curiale, M., Ayers, T., & Paulson, D. (2002) · Food Service Technology · doi:10.1046/j.1471-5740.2002.00043.x · Cited by 47
Bhargava, A., Mishra, B., Thakur, A., Dogra, V., Loomba, P., & Gupta, S. (2013) · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance · doi:10.1108/ijhcqa-04-2012-0035 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyce, J. M., & Pittet, D.
- Venue
- Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- S12
- Pages
- S3-S40
- ISSN
- 0899-823X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-6834
- OpenAlex
- W2123927481
- Cited by
- 1,655
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
