The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age‐Dependent Traits: A New Statistical Model to Separate Within‐ and Between‐Individual Effects
Open accessAbstract
Evolutionary questions regarding aging address patterns of within-individual change in traits during a lifetime. However, most studies report associations between age and, for example, reproduction based on cross-sectional comparisons, which may be confounded with progressive changes in phenotypic population composition. Unbiased estimation of patterns of age-dependent reproduction (or other traits) requires disentanglement of within-individual change (improvement, senescence) and between-individual change (selective appearance and disappearance). We introduce a new statistical model that allows patterns of variance and covariance to differ between levels of aggregation. Our approach is simpler than alternative methods and can quantify the relative contributions of within- and between-individual changes in one framework. We illustrate our model using data on a long-lived bird species, the oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus). We show that for different reproductive traits (timing of breeding and egg size), either within-individual improvement or selective appearance can result in a positive association between age and reproductive traits at the population level. Potential applications of our methodology are manifold because within- and between-individual patterns are likely to differ in many biological situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients
Schielzeth, H. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00012.x · Cited by 3,027
A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models
van de Pol, M., & Wright, J. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.006 · Cited by 951
Self-citationThe evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations
NUSSEY, D. H., WILSON, A. J., & BROMMER, J. E. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01300.x · Cited by 889
The timing of birds' breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding
Verhulst, S., & Nilsson, J.-Å. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2146 · Cited by 566
Self-citationA guide for studying among-individual behavioral variation from movement data in the wild
Hertel, A. G., Niemelä, P. T., Dingemanse, N. J., & Mueller, T. (2020) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-020-00216-8 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- van de Pol, M., & Verhulst, S.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 766-773
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2117622164
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age‐Dependent Traits: A New Statistical Model to Separate Within‐ and Between‐Individual Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/503331
- The paper
- van de Pol, M., & Verhulst, S. (2006). Age‐Dependent Traits: A New Statistical Model to Separate Within‐ and Between‐Individual Effects. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/503331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.