A randomized, blinded, multicenter trial of lipid-associated amphotericin B alone versus in combination with an antibody-based inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 in patients with invasive candidiasis.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Mycograb (NeuTec Pharma) is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody against heat shock protein 90 that, in laboratory studies, was revealed to have synergy with amphotericin B against a broad spectrum of Candida species. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized study was conducted to determine whether lipid-associated amphotericin B plus Mycograb was superior to amphotericin B plus placebo in patients with culture-confirmed invasive candidiasis. Patients received a lipid-associated formulation of amphotericin B plus a 5-day course of Mycograb or placebo, having been stratified on the basis of Candida species (Candida albicans vs. non-albicans species of Candida). Inclusion criteria included clinical evidence of active infection at trial entry plus growth of Candida species on culture of a specimen from a clinically significant site within 3 days after initiation of study treatment. The primary efficacy variable was overall response to treatment (clinical and mycological resolution) by day 10. RESULTS: Of the 139 patients enrolled from Europe and the United States, 117 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. A complete overall response by day 10 was obtained for 29 (48%) of 61 patients in the amphotericin B group, compared with 47 (84%) of 56 patients in the Mycograb combination therapy group (odds ratio [OR], 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.41-13.79; P<.001). The following efficacy criteria were also met: clinical response (52% vs. 86%; OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.21-13.39; P<.001), mycological response (54% vs. 89%; OR, 7.1; 95% CI, 2.64-18.94; P<.001), Candida-attributable mortality (18% vs. 4%; OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.04-0.80; P = .025), and rate of culture-confirmed clearance of the infection (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.8; P = .001). Mycograb was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Mycograb plus lipid-associated amphotericin B produced significant clinical and culture-confirmed improvement in outcome for patients with invasive candidiasis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recombinant antibody against the C. albicans chaperone had therapeutic benefits in a clinical trial in combination with amphotericin B.
“This recombinant antibody had therapeutic benefits in a clinical trial in combination with amphotericin B, which targets ergosterol [52].”
From Hsp90 Governs Echinocandin Resistance in the Pathogenic Yeast Candida albicans via Calcineurin (2009) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 307
- Authors
- Pachl, J., Svoboda, P., Jacobs, F., Vandewoude, K., van der Hoven, B., Spronk, P., Masterson, G., Malbrain, M., Aoun, M., Garbino, J., Takala, J., Drgona, L., Burnie, J., Matthews, R., & Mycograb Invasive Candidiasis Study Group
- Affiliations
- Charles University (CZ)
- Erasmus Hospital (BE)
- Ghent University Hospital (BE)
- Gelre Hospitals (NL)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg (BE)
- Institut Jules Bordet (BE)
- University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
- University Hospital of Bern (CH)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Matthews, R.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1404-1413
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2149149952
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 20.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- invasive candidiasis, Hsp90 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, combination antifungal therapy, Candida albicans, non-albicans Candida, treatment response, antifungal synergy, candidemia
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Amphotericin B, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Recombinant Proteins, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review