The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Survival Benefits of AIDS Treatment in the United States
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As widespread adoption of potent combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) reaches its tenth year, our objective was to quantify the cumulative survival benefits of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) care in the United States. METHODS: We defined eras corresponding to advances in standards of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease care, including opportunistic infection prophylaxis, treatment with ART, and the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (pMTCT) of HIV. Per-person survival benefits for each era were determined using a mathematical simulation model. Published estimates provided the number of adult patients with new diagnoses of AIDS who were receiving care in the United States from 1989 to 2003. RESULTS: Compared with survival associated with untreated HIV disease, per-person survival increased 0.26 years with Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis alone. Four eras of increasingly effective ART in addition to prophylaxis resulted in per-person survival increases of 7.81, 11.05, 11.57, and 13.33 years, compared with the absence of treatment. Treatment for patients with AIDS in care in the United States since 1989 yielded a total survival benefit of 2.8 million years. pMTCT averted nearly 2900 infant infections, equivalent to 137,000 additional years of survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: At least 3.0 million years of life have been saved in the United States as a direct result of care of patients with AIDS, highlighting the significant advances made in HIV disease treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Montaner, J. S., Lima, V. D., Barrios, R., Yip, B., Wood, E., Kerr, T., Shannon, K., Harrigan, P. R., Hogg, R. S., Daly, P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60936-1 · Cited by 780
Anti-HIV drugs: 25 compounds approved within 25 years after the discovery of HIV.
De Clercq, E. (2009) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.10.010 · Cited by 627
Margolis, D. A., Gonzalez-Garcia, J., Stellbrink, H.-J., Eron, J. J., Yazdanpanah, Y., Podzamczer, D., Lutz, T., Angel, J. B., Richmond, G. J., Clotet, B., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31917-7 · Cited by 499
Redefining the Viral Reservoirs that Prevent HIV-1 Eradication
Eisele, E., & Siliciano, R. F. (2012) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.08.010 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Walensky, R. P., Paltiel, A. D., Losina, E., Mercincavage, L. M., Schackman, B. R., Sax, P. E., Weinstein, M. C., & Freedberg, K. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 194
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-19
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2136683144
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Survival Benefits of AIDS Treatment in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/505147
- The paper
- Walensky, R. P., Paltiel, A. D., Losina, E., Mercincavage, L. M., Schackman, B. R., Sax, P. E., Weinstein, M. C., & Freedberg, K. A. (2006). The Survival Benefits of AIDS Treatment in the United States. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/505147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.