Cited by 479Youth Culture and Social DynamicsGlobalization and Cultural IdentityConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

The Glocalization of Youth Culture: The Global Youth Segment as Structures of Common Difference

Kjeldgaard, Dannie, Askegaard, Søren·2006·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

In this article we present an analysis of global youth cultural consumption based on a multisited empirical study of young consumers in Denmark and Greenland. We treat youth culture as a market ideology by tracing the emergence of youth culture in relation to marketing and how the ideology has glocalized. This transnational market ideology is manifested in the glocalization of three structures of common difference that organize our data: identity, center-periphery, and reference to youth cultural consumption styles. Our study goes beyond accounts of global homogenization and local appropriation by showing the glocal structural commonalities in diverse manifestations of youth culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/506304

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From this vantage point, Nasrine is rendered a connected cosmopolitan, deftly participating in the global flows of youth culture.

    “From this vantage point, Nasrine is rendered a connected cosmopolitan, deftly participating in the global flows of youth culture (Kjeldgaard and Askegaard 2006).”
  • Rationalizing enables consumers to address the tension between the ethnic and responsibilized consumer subject by constructing themselves as insiders of a shared transnational collective.

    “Adopted by those like Nasrine, a connected cosmopolitan participant of global youth culture (Kjeldgaard and Askegaard 2006), or Ruby and Nadia who claim a shared regional Asian consciousness (Cayla and Eckhardt 2008), rationalizing enables consumers to address the tension between the ethnic and responsibilized consumer subject by constructing themselves as insiders of a shared transnational”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kjeldgaard, D., & Askegaard, S.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2006-09
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
231-247
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2097736186
Cited by
479
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 39
FWCI
46.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Culture and Social Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Globalization and Cultural Identity
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
glocalization, youth culture, market ideology, transnational marketing, common difference, identity, center-periphery relations, consumption styles, local appropriation, young consumers, Denmark, Greenland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review