Cited by 33Library Science and AdministrationLaw, Rights, and FreedomsInformation Science and Libraries

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intellectual Freedom and Libraries: Complexity and Change in the Twenty‐First‐Century Digital Environment

Dresang, Eliza T.·2006·The Library Quarterly

Abstract

What is the state of intellectual freedom and libraries in the early twenty‐first‐century digital environment? This question is addressed largely in relation to public and school libraries, where more than 90 percent of documented challenges exist and at which most legislative and judicial actions relevant to intellectual freedom and libraries are directed. Analyses of changing perceptions of the intellectual‐freedom leadership role of women and children; of the relevant policy documents of the American Library Association; of recent legislation and judicial decisions, focused on both books and the Internet; and of the current public perception of libraries as a public good reveal the complexities and tensions that exist in the answer to this question. One possible explanation for the current state of intellectual freedom and libraries is offered through application of radical‐change theory. Changes in research, education, and practice are suggested based on the conclusions from these analyses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/506576

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. American Library Association (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF)., 2006, Core Values of Librarianship
  2. OIF., 2006, Intellectual Freedom Manual
  3. McReynolds Rosalee, 1990, The Progressive Librarians
  4. Hopkins, Dianne McAfee. “The School Library Media Specialist and Intellectual Freedom during the Twentieth Century.” InThe Emerging School Library Media Center: Historical Issues and Perspectives, edited by Kathy Howard Latrobe, pp. 39–55. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1998.
  5. Kotrla M. Bowie., 2000, Unpublished manuscript
  6. OIF., 2006, The 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books from 1990–2000 and Challenges by Initiator, Institution, Type, and Year
  7. 1969, Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503, 89 S. Ct. 733, 21 L. Ed. 2d. 731
  8. Education, 1982, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 102 S. Ct. 2799, 73 L. Ed. 2d 435
  9. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260, 108 S. Ct. 562, 98 L., 1988, 2d 592
  10. 1995, Unified School District No. 233, 908 F. Supp. 864 (D. Kan
  11. Jenkins Christine A, 1996, Library Trends, 44, 812
  12. Jenkins Christine A, 1996, Librarianship
  13. Castagna Edwin, Voigt, 2, 51
  14. Robbins Louise S, 2000, The Dismissal of Miss Ruth Brown: Civil Rights, Censorship, and the American Library
  15. Intellectual Freedom Round Table, 2006, John Phillip Immroth Memorial Award
  16. Krull Kathleen, 1999, A Kid’s Guide to America’s Bill of Rights: Curfews, Censorship, and the 100‐Pound Giant
  17. Freedman, 2003, Defense of Liberty: The Story of America’s Bill of Rights.
  18. First Amendment Center, 2006, First Amendment Schools
  19. Free Expression, 2001, Kidspeak! Where Kids Speak Up for Free Speech
  20. ALA., March 31, 2005. http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/relatedlinksa/revisedifpolicies.htm.
  21. ALA, 2005, Congress on Professional Education. “Report of the Core Values Task Force II: ALA Annual Conference 2001
  22. Baldwin Gordon B, 1996, Library Trends, 45, 7
  23. Fiske Marjorie, 1959, Book Selection and Censorship: A Study of School and Public Libraries in California
  24. Coley Ken P, 2002, Moving toward a Method to Test for Self‐Censorship by School Library Media Specialists
  25. Wiegand Shirley A, 1996, Library Trends, 45, 75
  26. Social Responsibilities Round Table, 2002, SRRT Information
  27. Samek Toni, 1967, Intellectual Freedom and Social Responsibility in American Librarianship
  28. Samek Toni, 1996, Library Trends, 45, 50
  29. Berginhausen Daniel, 1972, Library Journal, 97, 3675
  30. Hopkins McAfee, 1996, Library Trends, 45, 61
  31. Leffingwell S. L., 2003, Texas Library Journal, 79, 110
  32. Garden Nancy, 1982, Annie on My Mind
  33. Jenkins Christine A, 2003, School Library Journal, 49, 48
  34. Meyer Randy, 1996, School Library Journal, 42, 22
  35. 2003, Cedarville School District, 295 F. Supp. 2d 996 (W. D. Ark
  36. Rowling J. K., 1998, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone
  37. Rowling J. K., 1999, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
  38. Rowling J. K., 2000, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
  39. Rowling J. K., 2003, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
  40. Bertot, 2002, Charles M. “Public Libraries and the Internet 2002: Internet Connectivity and Networked Services.
  41. Institute for Educational Sciences, 1994, National Center for Education Statistics. Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms
  42. Washington Office, 2006, CIPA and Libraries
  43. Heins Marjorie, 2001, Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth.
  44. Intellectual Freedom Round Table, 2006, Eli M. Oboler Memorial Award
  45. Public Access Computing Project, 2004, Research Summary
  46. GreenNet Educational Trust, 2003, Silenced: Censorship and Control of the Internet
  47. OIF., 2006, USA PATRIOT Act and Intellectual Freedom
  48. ALA., 2003, American Libraries Online (September 22, 2003
  49. Mendels Pamela, 1999, New York Times (April 20
  50. Dresang Eliza T, 1997, Library Trends: The Child and the Digital Library, 45, 639
  51. 10.1080/00405849909543848 · DOI
  52. Dresang, 1999, Eliza T. Radical Change: Books for Youth in a Digital Age
  53. Simmons John S, 2001, School Censorship in the 21st Century: A Guide for Teachers and School Library Media Specialists
  54. 10.1086/603127 · DOI
  55. Fisher Karen E, 2005, Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher’s Guide
  56. Abele Marta J, 2003, PhD diss.
  57. Hammerberg Dawnene Diane, 2001, Language Arts, 78, 207, 10.58680/la2001157 · DOI
  58. Nodelman Perry, 2003, The Pleasures of Children’s Literature
  59. 10.1016/S0740-8188(02)00131-7 · DOI
  60. Wiegand Wayne, 1996, Library Trends, 45, 1
  61. Kennedy Elizabeth, 2006, Harry Potter 6: The Hottest Topic in Children’s Books
  62. Memmott Carol, 2005, USA Today (March 30, 2005
  63. Intellectual Freedom Round Table, June 19, 2002. http://www.ala.org/ala/ifrt/ifrtinaction/ifcompetencies/ifcompetencies.htm.
  64. 10.1086/382843 · DOI
  65. First Amendment Center, 2004, State of the First Amendment
  66. Fish Stanley, 1994, Too.
  67. Robbins Louise S, 1939, Censorship and the American Library: The American Library Association’s Response to Threats to Intellectual Freedom

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Dresang, E. T.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Dresang, Eliza T.
Venue
The Library Quarterly
Published
2006-04
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
169-192
ISSN
  • 0024-2519 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-652X
OpenAlex
W2065584584
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Library Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
  • Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
freedom of thought, libraries, public libraries, school libraries, censorship, library legislation, judicial decisions, public perception of libraries, digital environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intellectual Freedom and Libraries: Complexity and Change in the Twenty‐First‐Century Digital Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/506576
The paper
Dresang, E. T. (2006). Intellectual Freedom and Libraries: Complexity and Change in the Twenty‐First‐Century Digital Environment. The Library Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1086/506576