Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Morphological Diversities among Star‐forming Galaxies at High Redshifts in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey

Open access
Ravindranath, Swara, Giavalisco, Mauro, Ferguson, Henry C., Conselice, Christopher, Katz, Neal, Weinberg, Martin, Lotz, Jennifer, Dickinson, Mark, Fall, S. Michael, Mobasher, Bahram, Papovich, Casey·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We used the deep, multiwavelength images obtained by the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) to identify ~4700 Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) at z > 2.5, and 292 starburst galaxies at z ~ 1.2. We present the results from morphological analysis based on light profile shape and ellipticity for ~1333 of the most luminous LBGs. About 40% of LBGs at z ~ 3 have exponential profiles, ~30% of the galaxies have steep ( r 1/4 -like) profiles, and ~30% of LBGs have multiple cores of disturbed morphologies suggestive of close pairs or mergers. The fraction of spheriod-like LBGs decrease by about 15% from z ~ 5 to 3. A comparison of LBGs with the starburst galaxies at z ~ 1.2 shows that disklike and merger morphologies are dominant, but the fraction of spheroid-like profiles is about 20% higher among LBGs. The ellipticity distribution for LBGs exhibits a pronounced skew toward high ellipticities (ϵ > 0.5), which cannot be explained by morphologies similar to the local disks and spheroids viewed at random orientations. The peak of the distribution evolves toward lower ϵ, from 0.7 at z = 4 to ~0.5 at z = 3. The ellipticity distribution for the z ~ 1.2 galaxies is relatively flat, similar to that seen for present-day galaxies. The dominance of elongated morphologies suggests that in a significant fraction of LBGs we may be witnessing star formation in clumps along gas-rich filaments, or the earliest gas-rich bars that encompass essentially the entire visible galaxy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/507016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Ravindranath, S., Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Conselice, C., Katz, N., Weinberg, M., Lotz, J., Dickinson, M., Fall, S. M., Mobasher, B., & Papovich, C.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-12
Volume
652
Issue
2
Pages
963-980
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1974345955
Cited by
158
References
2
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Morphological Diversities among Star‐forming Galaxies at High Redshifts in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/507016
The paper
Ravindranath, S., Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Conselice, C., Katz, N., Weinberg, M., Lotz, J., Dickinson, M., Fall, S. M., Mobasher, B., & Papovich, C. (2006). The Morphological Diversities among Star‐forming Galaxies at High Redshifts in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/507016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.