The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the relationships between the residential choices of individuals and aggregate segregation patterns. Analyses based on computational models show that high levels of segregation occur only when individuals’ preferences follow a threshold function. If individuals make finer‐grained distinctions among neighborhoods that vary in racial composition, preferences alone do not lead to segregation. Vignette data indicate that individuals respond in a continuous way to variations in the racial makeup of neighborhoods rather than to a threshold. Race preferences alone may be insufficient to account for the high levels of segregation observed in American cities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration
Axelrod, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9781400822300 · Cited by 1,759
Cited by
STRUCTURAL RACISM AND HEALTH INEQUITIES: Old Issues, New Directions
Gee, G. C., & Ford, C. L. (2011) · Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x11000130 · Cited by 1,388
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization
Dandekar, P., Goel, A., & Lee, D. T. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1217220110 · Cited by 435
Biased Assimilation, Homophily, and the Dynamics of Polarization
Dandekar, P., Goel, A., & Lee, D. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35311-6_47 · Cited by 201
Darrah, J., & DeLuca, S. (2014) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.21758 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruch, E. E., & Mare, R. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 667-709
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1862383500
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 56.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
