The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Getting a Kick Out of Numerical Relativity
Open accessAbstract
Recent developments in numerical relativity have made it possible to reliably follow the coalescence of two black holes from near the innermost stable circular orbit to final ringdown. This opens up a wide variety of exciting astrophysical applications of these simulations. Chief among these is the net kick received when two unequal mass or spinning black holes merge. The magnitude of this kick has bearing on the production and growth of supermassive black holes during the epoch of structure formation, and on the retention of black holes in stellar clusters. Here we report the first accurate numerical calculation of this kick, for two nonspinning black holes in a 1.5 : 1 mass ratio, which is expected on the basis of analytic considerations to give a significant fraction of the maximum possible recoil. We have performed multiple runs with different initial separations, orbital angular momenta, resolutions, extraction radii, and gauges. The full range of our kick speeds is 86-116 km s -1 , and the most reliable runs give kicks between 86 and 97 km s -1 . This is intermediate between the estimates from two recent post-Newtonian analyses and suggests that at redshifts z ≳ 10, halos with masses ≲10 9 M ☉ will have difficulty retaining coalesced black holes after major mergers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with Gravitational Waves
Sathyaprakash, B. S., & Schutz, B. F. (2009) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2009-2 · Cited by 874
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Formation of z∼6 Quasars from Hierarchical Galaxy Mergers
Li, Y., Hernquist, L., Robertson, B., Cox, T. J., Hopkins, P. F., Springel, V., Gao, L., Di Matteo, T., Zentner, A. R., Jenkins, A., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/519297 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, J. G., Centrella, J., Choi, D.-I., Koppitz, M., van Meter, J. R., & Miller, M. C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-12-06
- Volume
- 653
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- L93-L96
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2162967009
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Getting a Kick Out of Numerical Relativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/510448
- The paper
- Baker, J. G., Centrella, J., Choi, D.-I., Koppitz, M., van Meter, J. R., & Miller, M. C. (2006). Getting a Kick Out of Numerical Relativity. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/510448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.