Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Ebola Viruses

Open access
Ksiazek, Thomas G., West, Cynthia P., Rollin, Pierre E., Jahrling, Peter B., Peters, C. J.·1999·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

EIAs for IgG and IgM antibodies directed against Ebola (EBO) viral antigens have been developed and evaluated using sera of animals and humans surviving infection with EBO viruses.The IgM capture assay detected anti-EBO (subtype Reston) antibodies in the sera of 5 of 5 experimentally infected animals at the time they succumbed to lethal infections.IgM antibodies were also detected in the serum of a human who was infected with EBO (subtype Reston) during a postmortem examination of an infected monkey.The antibody was detectable as early as day 6 after infection in experimentally infected animals and persisted for õ90 days.The IgG response was less rapid; however, it persisted for ú400 days in 3 animals who survived infection, and it persisted for Ç10 years after infection in the sera of 2 humans.Although these data are limited by the number of sera available for verification, the IgM assay seems to have great promise as a diagnostic tool.Furthermore the long-term persistence of the IgG antibodies measured by this test strongly suggests that the ELISA will be useful in field investigations of EBO virus.In conducting the research described in this report, the investigator(s) adhered to the ''Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals,'' as promul-experimentally infected primates and humans who survived gated by the Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute EBO infections. of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council.The facilities are fully accredited by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.The views of the author(s) do not purport to reflect the positions of the Materials and Methods

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/514313

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Ksiazek, T. G., West, C. P., Rollin, P. E., Jahrling, P. B., & Peters, C. J.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
1999-02
Volume
179
Issue
s1
Pages
S192-S198
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2160047153
Cited by
255
References
1
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Ebola Viruses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/514313
The paper
Ksiazek, T. G., West, C. P., Rollin, P. E., Jahrling, P. B., & Peters, C. J. (1999). ELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Ebola Viruses. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/514313

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.