The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Small Colony Variants in Staphylococcal Infections: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications
Abstract
The discovery of S. aureus small colony variants as persistent and intracellular has provided new insight into the understanding of pathogenesis associated with staphylococcal diseases. Survival advantages are afforded to SCVs on the basis of their ability to hide within host cells, which provide protection from the immune system and some antibiotics. In addition, because most clinical SCVs are defective in electron transport, their uptake of positively charged antimicrobial substances is reduced. The atypical clinical microbiologic characteristics make identification and susceptibility testing difficult. SCVs have been recovered from patients with unusually persistent infections, particularly those patients with long disease-free intervals, and from patients who are chronically exposed to aminoglycosides and TMP-SMZ, suggesting that these clinical situations are those in which SCVs should be suspected and the clinical laboratory should carefully search for them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Persistent and Relapsing Infections Associated with Small-Colony Variants of Staphylococcus aureus
Proctor, R. A., van Langevelde, P., Kristjansson, M., Maslow, J. N., & Arbeit, R. D. (1995) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/20.1.95 · Cited by 437
Self-citationvon Eiff, C., Heilmann, C., Proctor, R. A., Woltz, C., Peters, G., & Götz, F. (1997) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.179.15.4706-4712.1997 · Cited by 310
Balwit, J. M., Langevelde, P. V., Vann, J. M., & Proctor, R. A. (1994) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/170.4.1033 · Cited by 237
Cited by
Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L., & Fowler, V. G. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00134-14 · Cited by 5,192
Proctor, R. A., von Eiff, C., Kahl, B. C., Becker, K., McNamara, P., Herrmann, M., & Peters, G. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1384 · Cited by 1,175
Self-citationHowden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
Pathogenesis of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Gordon, R. J., & Lowy, F. D. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/533591 · Cited by 961
Staphylococcus epidermidis infections
Vuong, C., & Otto, M. (2002) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01563-0 · Cited by 708
Metadata
- Authors
- Proctor, R. A., & Peters, G.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 419-422
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2152594398
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small Colony Variants in Staphylococcal Infections: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/514706
- The paper
- Proctor, R. A., & Peters, G. (1998). Small Colony Variants in Staphylococcal Infections: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/514706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.