Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COSMOS: Three‐dimensional Weak Lensing and the Growth of Structure

Open access
Massey, Richard, Rhodes, Jason, Leauthaud, Alexie, Capak, Peter, Ellis, Richard, Koekemoer, Anton, Refregier, Alexandre, Scoville, Nick, Taylor, James E., Albert, Justin, Berge, Joel, Heymans, Catherine, Johnston, David, Kneib, Jean‐Paul, Mellier, Yannick, Mobasher, Bahram, Semboloni, Elisabetta, Shopbell, Patrick, Tasca, Lidia, Van Waerbeke, Ludovic·2007·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We present a three-dimensional cosmic shear analysis of the Hubble Space Telescope COSMOS survey, the largest ever optical imaging program performed in space. We have measured the shapes of galaxies for the telltale distortions caused by weak gravitational lensing and traced the growth of that signal as a function of redshift. Using both 2D and 3D analyses, we measure cosmological parameters Ω m , the density of matter in the universe, and σ 8 , the normalization of the matter power spectrum. The introduction of redshift information tightens the constraints by a factor of 3 and also reduces the relative sampling (or "cosmic") variance compared to recent surveys that may be larger but are only two-dimensional. From the 3D analysis, we find that σ 8 (Ω m /0.3) 0.44 = 0.866 at 68% confidence limits, including both statistical and potential systematic sources of error in the total budget. Indeed, the absolute calibration of shear measurement methods is now the dominant source of uncertainty. Assuming instead a baseline cosmology to fix the geometry of the universe, we have measured the growth of structure on both linear and nonlinear physical scales. Our results thus demonstrate a proof of concept for tomographic analysis techniques that have been proposed for future weak-lensing surveys by a dedicated wide-field telescope in space.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/516599

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Massey, R., Rhodes, J., Leauthaud, A., Capak, P., Ellis, R., Koekemoer, A., Refregier, A., Scoville, N., Taylor, J. E., Albert, J., Berge, J., Heymans, C., Johnston, D., Kneib, J., Mellier, Y., Mobasher, B., Semboloni, E., Shopbell, P., Tasca, L., & Van Waerbeke, L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2007-09
Volume
172
Issue
1
Pages
239-253
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2103336816
Cited by
259
References
1
FWCI
21.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COSMOS: Three‐dimensional Weak Lensing and the Growth of Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/516599
The paper
Massey, R., Rhodes, J., Leauthaud, A., Capak, P., Ellis, R., Koekemoer, A., Refregier, A., Scoville, N., Taylor, J. E., Albert, J., Berge, J., Heymans, C., Johnston, D., Kneib, J., Mellier, Y., Mobasher, B., Semboloni, E., Shopbell, P., Tasca, L., & Van Waerbeke, L. (2007). COSMOS: Three‐dimensional Weak Lensing and the Growth of Structure. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/516599

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.