Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 748

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing

Open access
Koekemoer, A. M., Aussel, H., Calzetti, D., Capak, P., Giavalisco, M., Kneib, J.‐P., Leauthaud, A., Le Fevre, O., McCracken, H. J., Massey, R., Mobasher, B., Rhodes, J., Scoville, N., Shopbell, P. L.·2007·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We describe the details of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) Wide Field Channel (WFC) observations of the COSMOS field, including the data calibration and processing procedures. We obtained a total of 583 orbits of HST ACS/WFC imaging in the F814W filter, covering a field that is 1.64 deg2 in area, the largest contiguous field ever imaged with HST. The median exposure depth across the field is 2028 s (one HST orbit), achieving a limiting point-source depth AB(F814W) = 27.2 (5 σ). We also present details of the astrometric image registration and distortion removal and image combination using MultiDrizzle, motivating the choice of our final pixel scale (30 mas pixel-1), based on the requirements for weak-lensing science. The final set of images are publicly available through the archive sites at IPAC and STScI, along with further documentation on how they were produced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/520086

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Anderson, J. 2005, in HST Calibration Workshop, ed. A. M. Koekemoer, P. Goudfrooij, & L. L. Dressel (Baltimore: STScI), 11
  2. 10.1086/507302 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Capak P., 2007, ApJS, 172, 99, 10.1086/519081 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Davis M.., 2006, ApJ, 660, L1, 10.1086/517931 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1086/338393 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1086/379232 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Koekemoer, A. M., Fruchter, A. S., Hook, R. N. & Hack, W. 2002, in HST Calibration Workshop, ed. S. Arribas, A. M. Koekemoer, & B. Whitmore (Baltimore: STScI), 337
  8. 10.1086/516592 · DOI
  9. 10.1086/420885 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1086/517885 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1086/424860 · doi:10.1086/424860
  12. 10.1086/516585 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1086/516580 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Taniguchi Y., 2007, ApJS, 172, 9, 10.1086/516596 · DOI
  15. 10.1086/118105 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1086/316854 · doi:10.1086/316854

Cited by

See all 748

Metadata

Authors
Koekemoer, A. M., Aussel, H., Calzetti, D., Capak, P., Giavalisco, M., Kneib, J. ‐., Leauthaud, A., Le Fevre, O., McCracken, H. J., Massey, R., Mobasher, B., Rhodes, J., Scoville, N., & Shopbell, P. L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2007-09
Volume
172
Issue
1
Pages
196-202
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2093697839
Cited by
748
References
0
FWCI
22.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/520086
The paper
Koekemoer, A. M., Aussel, H., Calzetti, D., Capak, P., Giavalisco, M., Kneib, J. ‐., Leauthaud, A., Le Fevre, O., McCracken, H. J., Massey, R., Mobasher, B., Rhodes, J., Scoville, N., & Shopbell, P. L. (2007). The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/520086

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.