The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Absolute Calibration and Characterization of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer. II. 70 μm Imaging
Open accessAbstract
The absolute calibration and characterization of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) 70 μm coarse‐ and fine‐scale imaging modes are presented based on over 2.5 yr of observations. Accurate photometry (especially for faint sources) requires two simple processing steps beyond the standard data reduction to remove long‐term detector transients. Point‐spread function (PSF) fitting photometry is found to give more accurate flux densities than aperture photometry. Based on the PSF fitting photometry, the calibration factor shows no strong trend with flux density, background, spectral type, exposure time, or time since anneals. The coarse‐scale calibration sample includes observations of stars with flux densities from 22 mJy to 17 Jy, on backgrounds from 4 to 26 MJy sr −1 , and with spectral types from B to M. The coarse‐scale calibration is 702 ± 35 MJy sr −1 MIPS70 −1 (5% uncertainty) and is based on measurements of 66 stars. The instrumental units of the MIPS 70 μm coarse‐ and fine‐scale imaging modes are called MIPS70 and MIPS70F, respectively. The photometric repeatability is calculated to be 4.5% from two stars measured during every MIPS campaign and includes variations on all timescales probed. The preliminary fine‐scale calibration factor is 2894 ± 294 MJy sr −1 MIPS70F −1 (10% uncertainty) based on 10 stars. The uncertainties in the coarse‐ and fine‐scale calibration factors are dominated by the 4.5% photometric repeatability and the small sample size, respectively. The 5 σ, 500 s sensitivity of the coarse‐scale observations is 6–8 mJy. This work shows that the MIPS 70 μm array produces accurate, well‐calibrated photometry and validates the MIPS 70 μm operating strategy, especially the use of frequent stimulator flashes to track the changing responsivities of the Ge:Ga detectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sp i t zer MIPS Infrared Imaging of M31: Further Evidence for a Spiral-Ring Composite Structure
Gordon, K. D., Bailin, J., Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, G. H., Misselt, K. A., Latter, W. B., Young, E. T., Ashby, M. L. N., Barmby, P., Gibson, B. K., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/501046 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Cited by
Common-Resolution Convolution Kernels for Space- and Ground-Based Telescopes
Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Gordon, K. D., & Sandstrom, K. (2011) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/662219 · Cited by 465
Self-citationEngelbracht, C. W., Blaylock, M., Su, K. Y. L., Rho, J., Rieke, G. H., Muzerolle, J., Padgett, D. L., Hines, D. C., Gordon, K. D., Fadda, D., et al. (2007) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/521881 · Cited by 310
Self-citationDebris Disks around Sun‐like Stars
Trilling, D. E., Bryden, G., Beichman, C. A., Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L., Stansberry, J. A., Blaylock, M., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Beeman, J. W., & Haller, E. E. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/525514 · Cited by 295
Self-citationTHE SPITZER INFRARED SPECTROGRAPH DEBRIS DISK CATALOG. I. CONTINUUM ANALYSIS OF UNRESOLVED TARGETS
Chen, C. H., Mittal, T., Kuchner, M., Forrest, W. J., Lisse, C. M., Manoj, P., Sargent, B. A., & Watson, D. M. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/25 · Cited by 269
Yusef-Zadeh, F., Hewitt, J. W., Arendt, R. G., Whitney, B., Rieke, G., Wardle, M., Hinz, J. L., Stolovy, S., Lang, C. C., Burton, M. G., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/1/178 · Cited by 217
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordon, K. D., Engelbracht, C. W., Fadda, D., Stansberry, J., Wachter, S., Frayer, D. T., Rieke, G., Noriega‐Crespo, A., Latter, W. B., Young, E., Neugebauer, G., Balog, Z., Beeman, J. W., Dole, H., Egami, E., Haller, E. E., Hines, D., Kelly, D., Marleau, F., Misselt, K., Morrison, J., Pérez‐González, P., Rho, J., & Wheaton, W. A.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 859
- Pages
- 1019-1037
- ISSN
- 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3873
- OpenAlex
- W2162282327
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absolute Calibration and Characterization of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer. II. 70 μm Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/522675
- The paper
- Gordon, K. D., Engelbracht, C. W., Fadda, D., Stansberry, J., Wachter, S., Frayer, D. T., Rieke, G., Noriega‐Crespo, A., Latter, W. B., Young, E., Neugebauer, G., Balog, Z., Beeman, J. W., Dole, H., Egami, E., Haller, E. E., Hines, D., Kelly, D., Marleau, F., . . . Wheaton, W. A. (2007). Absolute Calibration and Characterization of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer. II. 70 μm Imaging. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/522675
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.