Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Absolute Calibration and Characterization of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer. II. 70 μm Imaging

Open access
Gordon, Karl D., Engelbracht, Charles W., Fadda, Dario, Stansberry, John, Wachter, Stefanie, Frayer, Dave T., Rieke, George, Noriega‐Crespo, Alberto, Latter, William B., Young, Erick, Neugebauer, Gerry, Balog, Zoltan, Beeman, Jeffrey W., Dole, Hervé, Egami, Eiichi, Haller, Eugene E., Hines, Dean, Kelly, Doug, Marleau, Francine, Misselt, Karl, Morrison, Jane, Pérez‐González, Pablo, Rho, Jeonghee, Wheaton, Wm. A.·2007·Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Abstract

The absolute calibration and characterization of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) 70 μm coarse‐ and fine‐scale imaging modes are presented based on over 2.5 yr of observations. Accurate photometry (especially for faint sources) requires two simple processing steps beyond the standard data reduction to remove long‐term detector transients. Point‐spread function (PSF) fitting photometry is found to give more accurate flux densities than aperture photometry. Based on the PSF fitting photometry, the calibration factor shows no strong trend with flux density, background, spectral type, exposure time, or time since anneals. The coarse‐scale calibration sample includes observations of stars with flux densities from 22 mJy to 17 Jy, on backgrounds from 4 to 26 MJy sr −1 , and with spectral types from B to M. The coarse‐scale calibration is 702 ± 35 MJy sr −1 MIPS70 −1 (5% uncertainty) and is based on measurements of 66 stars. The instrumental units of the MIPS 70 μm coarse‐ and fine‐scale imaging modes are called MIPS70 and MIPS70F, respectively. The photometric repeatability is calculated to be 4.5% from two stars measured during every MIPS campaign and includes variations on all timescales probed. The preliminary fine‐scale calibration factor is 2894 ± 294 MJy sr −1 MIPS70F −1 (10% uncertainty) based on 10 stars. The uncertainties in the coarse‐ and fine‐scale calibration factors are dominated by the 4.5% photometric repeatability and the small sample size, respectively. The 5 σ, 500 s sensitivity of the coarse‐scale observations is 6–8 mJy. This work shows that the MIPS 70 μm array produces accurate, well‐calibrated photometry and validates the MIPS 70 μm operating strategy, especially the use of frequent stimulator flashes to track the changing responsivities of the Ge:Ga detectors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/522675

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Gordon, K. D., Engelbracht, C. W., Fadda, D., Stansberry, J., Wachter, S., Frayer, D. T., Rieke, G., Noriega‐Crespo, A., Latter, W. B., Young, E., Neugebauer, G., Balog, Z., Beeman, J. W., Dole, H., Egami, E., Haller, E. E., Hines, D., Kelly, D., Marleau, F., Misselt, K., Morrison, J., Pérez‐González, P., Rho, J., & Wheaton, W. A.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Published
2007-09
Volume
119
Issue
859
Pages
1019-1037
ISSN
  • 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3873
OpenAlex
W2162282327
Cited by
206
References
1
FWCI
35.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absolute Calibration and Characterization of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer. II. 70 μm Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/522675
The paper
Gordon, K. D., Engelbracht, C. W., Fadda, D., Stansberry, J., Wachter, S., Frayer, D. T., Rieke, G., Noriega‐Crespo, A., Latter, W. B., Young, E., Neugebauer, G., Balog, Z., Beeman, J. W., Dole, H., Egami, E., Haller, E. E., Hines, D., Kelly, D., Marleau, F., . . . Wheaton, W. A. (2007). Absolute Calibration and Characterization of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer. II. 70 μm Imaging. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/522675

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.