The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of Galaxy Mergers and Morphology at z< 1.2 in the Extended Groth Strip
Open accessAbstract
We present the quantitative rest-frame B morphological evolution and galaxy merger fraction at 0.2 < z < 1.2 as observed by the All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS). We use the Gini coefficient and M 20 to identify major mergers and classify galaxy morphology for a volume-limited sample of 3009 galaxies brighter than 0.4 L * B , assuming pure luminosity evolution. We find that the merger fraction remains roughly constant at 10% ± 2% for 0.2 < z < 1.2. The fraction of E/S0/Sa galaxies increases from 21% ± 3% at z ∼ 1.1 to 44% ± 9% at z ∼ 0.3, while the fraction of Sb-Ir galaxies decreases from 64% ± 6% at z ∼ 1.1 to 47% ± 9% at z ∼ 0.3. The majority of z < 1.2 Spitzer MIPS 24 μm sources with L (IR) > 10 11 L ☉ are disk galaxies, and only ~15% are classified as major merger candidates. Edge-on and dusty disk galaxies (Sb-Ir) are almost a third of the red sequence at z ∼ 1.1, while E/S0/Sa make up over 90% of the red sequence at z ∼ 0.3. Approximately 2% of our full sample are red mergers. We conclude (1) the merger rate does not evolve strongly between 0.2 < z < 1.2; (2) the decrease in the volume-averaged star formation rate density since z ∼ 1 is a result of declining star formation in disk galaxies rather than a disappearing population of major mergers; (3) the build-up of the red sequence at z < 1 can be explained by a doubling in the number of spheroidal galaxies since z ∼ 1.2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Cited by
Dancing in the dark: galactic properties trace spin swings along the cosmic web
Dubois, Y., Pichon, C., Welker, C., Le Borgne, D., Devriendt, J., Laigle, C., Codis, S., Pogosyan, D., Arnouts, S., Benabed, K., et al. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1227 · Cited by 888
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
GALAXY STELLAR MASS ASSEMBLY BETWEEN 0.2 <z< 2 FROM THE S-COSMOS SURVEY
Ilbert, O., Salvato, M., Le Floc'h, E., Aussel, H., Capak, P., McCracken, H. J., Mobasher, B., Kartaltepe, J., Scoville, N., Sanders, D. B., et al. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/709/2/644 · Cited by 687
Self-citationTHE KMOS3DSURVEY: DESIGN, FIRST RESULTS, AND THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY KINEMATICS FROM 0.7 ⩽z⩽ 2.7
Wisnioski, E., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Wuyts, S., Wuyts, E., Bandara, K., Wilman, D., Genzel, R., Bender, R., Davies, R., Fossati, M., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/209 · Cited by 580
Hopkins, P. F., Cox, T. J., Younger, J. D., & Hernquist, L. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/691/2/1168 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotz, J. M., Davis, M., Faber, S. M., Guhathakurta, P., Gwyn, S., Huang, J., Koo, D. C., Le Floc’h, E., Lin, L., Newman, J., Noeske, K., Papovich, C., Willmer, C. N. A., Coil, A., Conselice, C. J., Cooper, M., Hopkins, A. M., Metevier, A., Primack, J., Rieke, G., & Weiner, B. J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 672
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-197
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2043863877
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Galaxy Mergers and Morphology at z< 1.2 in the Extended Groth Strip. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/523659
- The paper
- Lotz, J. M., Davis, M., Faber, S. M., Guhathakurta, P., Gwyn, S., Huang, J., Koo, D. C., Le Floc’h, E., Lin, L., Newman, J., Noeske, K., Papovich, C., Willmer, C. N. A., Coil, A., Conselice, C. J., Cooper, M., Hopkins, A. M., Metevier, A., Primack, J., . . . Weiner, B. J. (2008). The Evolution of Galaxy Mergers and Morphology at z< 1.2 in the Extended Groth Strip. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/523659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.