Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Clinical Relevance of Serum Cryptococcal Antigen

Open access
Singh, N., Alexander, B. D., Lortholary, O., Dromer, F., Gupta, K. L., John, G. T., del Busto, R., Klintmalm, G. B., Somani, J., Lyon, G. M., Pursell, K., Stosor, V., Munoz, P., Limaye, A. P., Kalil, A. C., Pruett, T. L., Garcia-Diaz, J., Humar, A., Houston, S., House, A. A., Wray, D., Orloff, S., Dowdy, L. A., Fisher, R. A., Heitman, J., Wagener, M. M., Husain, S.·2008·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of serum cryptococcal antigen in the diagnosis and determinants of antigen positivity in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with pulmonary cryptococcosis has not been fully defined. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter study of SOT recipients with pulmonary cryptococcosis during 1999-2006. RESULTS: Forty (83%) of 48 patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis tested positive for cryptococcal antigen. Patients with concomitant extrapulmonary disease were more likely to have a positive antigen test result (P=.018), and antigen titers were higher in patients with extrapulmonary disease (P=.003) or fungemia (P=.045). Patients with single nodules were less likely to have a positive antigen test result than were those with all other radiographic presentations (P=.053). Among patients with isolated pulmonary cryptococcosis, lung transplant recipients were less likely to have positive cryptococcal antigen test results than were recipients of other types of SOT (P=.003). In all, 38% of the patients were asymptomatic or had pulmonary cryptococcosis detected as an incidental finding. Nodular densities or mass lesions were more likely to present as asymptomatic or incidentally detected pulmonary cryptococcosis than as pleural effusions and infiltrates (P=.008). CONCLUSIONS: A positive serum cryptococcal antigen test result in SOT recipients with pulmonary cryptococcosis appears to reflect extrapulmonary or more advanced radiographic disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/524738

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Singh, N., Alexander, B. D., Lortholary, O., Dromer, F., Gupta, K. L., John, G. T., del Busto, R., Klintmalm, G. B., Somani, J., Lyon, G. M., Pursell, K., Stosor, V., Munoz, P., Limaye, A. P., Kalil, A. C., Pruett, T. L., Garcia-Diaz, J., Humar, A., Houston, S., House, A. A., Wray, D., Orloff, S., Dowdy, L. A., Fisher, R. A., Heitman, J., Wagener, M. M., & Husain, S.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-01-15
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
e12-e18
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2151531790
Cited by
169
References
1
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Clinical Relevance of Serum Cryptococcal Antigen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/524738
The paper
Singh, N., Alexander, B. D., Lortholary, O., Dromer, F., Gupta, K. L., John, G. T., del Busto, R., Klintmalm, G. B., Somani, J., Lyon, G. M., Pursell, K., Stosor, V., Munoz, P., Limaye, A. P., Kalil, A. C., Pruett, T. L., Garcia-Diaz, J., Humar, A., Houston, S., . . . Husain, S. (2008). Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Clinical Relevance of Serum Cryptococcal Antigen. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/524738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.