The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Adjuvants on the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Avian Influenza H5N1 Vaccine in Adults
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Influenza A H5N1 viruses pose a significant threat to human health. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in 394 healthy adults. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 2 intramuscular doses of either saline placebo; influenza A/Vietnam/1203/2004(H5N1) vaccine alone at 45, 30, or 15 microg per dose; vaccine at 15 or 7.5 microg per dose with MF59; or vaccine at 30, 15, or 7.5 microg per dose with aluminum hydroxide. Subjects were followed up for safety and blood samples were obtained to determine antibody responses. RESULTS: The vaccine formulations were well tolerated but local adverse effects were common; the incidence of these effects increased in a dose-dependent manner and was increased by the addition of adjuvants. The addition of MF59 increased the antibody response, whereas the addition of aluminum hydroxide did not. The highest antibody responses were seen in the group that received 15 microg of vaccine per dose with MF59, in which 63% of subjects achieved the predetermined endpoint (hemagglutination-inhibition titer > or =40) 28 days after the second dose, compared with 29% in the group that received the highest dose (45 microg per dose) of vaccine alone. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-dose regimen of subvirion influenza A (H5N1) vaccine was well tolerated. The antibody responses to 15 microg of A/H5 vaccine with MF59 were higher than the responses to 45 microg of vaccine alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov identifier: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00280033?term= NCT00280033&rank=1 NCT00280033 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vaccine adjuvants: mechanisms and platforms
Zhao, T., Cai, Y., Jiang, Y., He, X., Wei, Y., Yu, Y., & Tian, X. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01557-7 · Cited by 1,020
Applications of nanotechnology for immunology
Smith, D. M., Simon, J. K., & Baker Jr, J. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3488 · Cited by 767
Influenza Virus: Dealing with a Drifting and Shifting Pathogen
Kim, H., Webster, R. G., & Webby, R. J. (2018) · Viral Immunology · doi:10.1089/vim.2017.0141 · Cited by 419
Khurana, S., Verma, N., Yewdell, J. W., Hilbert, A. K., Castellino, F., Lattanzi, M., Del Giudice, G., Rappuoli, R., & Golding, H. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002336 · Cited by 356
D’Aoust, M., Lavoie, P., Couture, M. M. ‐., Trépanier, S., Guay, J., Dargis, M., Mongrand, S., Landry, N., Ward, B. J., & Vézina, L. (2008) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00384.x · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernstein, D. I., Edwards, K. M., Dekker, C. L., Belshe, R., Talbot, H. K. B., Graham, I. L., Noah, D. L., He, F., & Hill, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 197
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 667-675
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2018151048
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Adjuvants on the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Avian Influenza H5N1 Vaccine in Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/527489
- The paper
- Bernstein, D. I., Edwards, K. M., Dekker, C. L., Belshe, R., Talbot, H. K. B., Graham, I. L., Noah, D. L., He, F., & Hill, H. (2008). Effects of Adjuvants on the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Avian Influenza H5N1 Vaccine in Adults. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/527489
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.