Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kinemetry of SINS High‐Redshift Star‐Forming Galaxies: Distinguishing Rotating Disks from Major Mergers

Open access
Shapiro, Kristen L., Genzel, Reinhard, Förster Schreiber, Natascha M., Tacconi, Linda J., Bouché, Nicolas, Cresci, Giovanni, Davies, Richard, Eisenhauer, Frank, Johansson, Peter H., Krajnović, Davor, Lutz, Dieter, Naab, Thorsten, Arimoto, Nobuo, Arribas, Santiago, Cimatti, Andrea, Colina, Luis, Daddi, Emanuele, Daigle, Olivier, Erb, Dawn, Hernandez, Olivier, Kong, Xu, Mignoli, Marco, Onodera, Masato, Renzini, Alvio, Shapley, Alice, Steidel, Charles·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a simple set of kinematic criteria that can distinguish between galaxies dominated by ordered rotational motion and those involved in major merger events. Our criteria are based on the dynamics of the warm ionized gas (as traced by Hα) within galaxies, making this analysis accessible to high-redshift systems, whose kinematics are primarily traceable through emission features. Using the method of kinemetry (developed by Krajnović and coworkers), we quantify asymmetries in both the velocity and velocity dispersion maps of the warm gas, and the resulting criteria enable us to empirically differentiate between nonmerging and merging systems at high redshift. We apply these criteria to 11 of our best-studied rest-frame UV/optical-selected z ∼ 2 galaxies for which we have near-infrared integral-field spectroscopic data from SINFONI on the VLT. Of these 11 systems, we find that >50% have kinematics consistent with a single rotating disk interpretation, while the remaining systems are more likely undergoing major mergers. This result, combined with the short formation timescales of these systems, provides evidence that rapid, smooth accretion of gas plays a significant role in galaxy formation at high redshift.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/587133

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, K. L., Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Tacconi, L. J., Bouché, N., Cresci, G., Davies, R., Eisenhauer, F., Johansson, P. H., Krajnović, D., Lutz, D., Naab, T., Arimoto, N., Arribas, S., Cimatti, A., Colina, L., Daddi, E., Daigle, O., Erb, D., Hernandez, O., Kong, X., Mignoli, M., Onodera, M., Renzini, A., Shapley, A., & Steidel, C.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-07-20
Volume
682
Issue
1
Pages
231-251
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2112341914
Cited by
269
References
1
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinemetry of SINS High‐Redshift Star‐Forming Galaxies: Distinguishing Rotating Disks from Major Mergers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/587133
The paper
Shapiro, K. L., Genzel, R., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Tacconi, L. J., Bouché, N., Cresci, G., Davies, R., Eisenhauer, F., Johansson, P. H., Krajnović, D., Lutz, D., Naab, T., Arimoto, N., Arribas, S., Cimatti, A., Colina, L., Daddi, E., Daigle, O., Erb, D., . . . Steidel, C. (2008). Kinemetry of SINS High‐Redshift Star‐Forming Galaxies: Distinguishing Rotating Disks from Major Mergers. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/587133

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.