The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection after Perioperative Antibacterial Prophylaxis before and during an Outbreak of Infection due to a Hypervirulent Strain
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Perioperative antibacterial prophylaxis (PAP) is an important component of surgical site infection prevention but may be associated with adverse effects, such as Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Since the emergence of a hypervirulent strain of C. difficile, the risk of development of CDI after PAP has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of PAP-induced CDI after selected surgical procedures and to compare such risk before with such risk after the emergence of the hypervirulent strain of C. difficile. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including all patients aged > or = 18 years who underwent either abdominal hysterectomy, hip arthroplasty, craniotomy, or colon, cardiac, or vascular surgery from August 1999 through May 2005 in a tertiary care hospital in Quebec, Canada. RESULTS: A total of 8373 surgical procedures were performed, and PAP was used in 7600 of these interventions. Of 98 CDI episodes identified, 40 occurred after patients received PAP only. The risk of CDI was 14.9 cases per 1000 surgical procedures among patients who received PAP only during the period 2003-2005, compared with 0.7 cases per 1000 surgical procedures during the period 1999-2002 (P < .001). The independent risk factors associated with CDI in patients given PAP only were older age, administration of cefoxitin (rather than cefazolin) alone or in combination with another drug, and year of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a large epidemic of CDI associated with the emergence of a novel strain, 1.5% of patients who received PAP as their sole antibiotic treatment developed CDI. In situations in which the only purpose of PAP is to prevent infrequent and relatively benign infections, the risks may outweigh the benefits in some elderly patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of a combined comorbidity index
Charlson, M., Szatrowski, T. P., Peterson, J., & Gold, J. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 · Cited by 6,587
Cited by
Rhee, C., Kadri, S. S., Dekker, J. P., Danner, R. L., Chen, H.-C., Fram, D., Zhang, F., Wang, R., Klompas, M., & Program, F. T. C. P. E. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2899 · Cited by 397
Rhee, C., Chiotos, K., Cosgrove, S. E., Heil, E. L., Kadri, S. S., Kalil, A. C., Gilbert, D. N., Masur, H., Septimus, E. J., Sweeney, D. A., et al. (2021) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa059 · Cited by 191
Tube feeding, the microbiota, and Clostridium difficile infection
O'Keefe, S. J. (2010) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v16.i2.139 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Carignan, A., Allard, C., Pépin, J., Cossette, B., Nault, V., & Valiquette, L.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-06-15
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1838-1843
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2161469103
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection after Perioperative Antibacterial Prophylaxis before and during an Outbreak of Infection due to a Hypervirulent Strain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/588291
- The paper
- Carignan, A., Allard, C., Pépin, J., Cossette, B., Nault, V., & Valiquette, L. (2008). Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection after Perioperative Antibacterial Prophylaxis before and during an Outbreak of Infection due to a Hypervirulent Strain. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/588291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.