Cited by 100Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Galaxy Bulges and their Black Holes: a Requirement for the Quenching of Star Formation

Open access
Bell, Eric F.·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

One of the central features of the last 8-10 billion years of cosmic history has been the emergence of a well-populated red sequence of non-star-forming galaxies. A number of models of galaxy formation and evolution have been devised to attempt to explain this behavior. Most current models require feedback from supermassive black holes (AGN feedback) to quench star formation in galaxies in the centers of their dark matter halos (central galaxies). Such models make the strong prediction that all quenched central galaxies must have a large supermassive black hole (and, by association, a prominent bulge component). I show using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey that the observations are consistent with this prediction. Over 99.5% of red-sequence galaxies with stellar masses in excess of 10 10 M ☉ have a prominent bulge component (as defined by having a Sérsic index n above 1.5). Those very rare red-sequence central galaxies with little or no bulge ( n < 1.5) usually have detectable star formation or AGN activity; the fraction of truly quenched bulgeless central galaxies is <0.1% of the total red-sequence population. I conclude that a bulge, and by implication a supermassive black hole, is an absolute requirement for full quenching of star formation in central galaxies. This is in agreement with the most basic prediction of the AGN feedback paradigm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/589551

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bell, E. F.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
Corresponding author
Bell, Eric F.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-07-20
Volume
682
Issue
1
Pages
355-360
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2063006174
Cited by
100
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Princeton University
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • New Mexico State University
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • U.S. Naval Observatory
  • Fermilab
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
galaxy bulges, supermassive black holes, AGN feedback, star formation quenching, red sequence galaxies, central galaxies, Sérsic index, galaxy evolution, dark matter halos

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review