Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Mass Distribution and Lifetime of Prestellar Cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus

Open access
Enoch, Melissa L., Evans II, Neal J., Sargent, Anneila I., Glenn, Jason, Rosolowsky, Erik, Myers, Philip·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present an unbiased census of starless cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus, assembled by comparing large-scale Bolocam 1.1 mm continuum emission maps with Spitzer c2d surveys. We use the c2d catalogs to separate 108 starless from 92 protostellar cores in the 1.1 mm core samples from Enoch and Young and their coworkers. A comparison of these populations reveals the initial conditions of the starless cores. Starless cores in Perseus have similar masses but larger sizes and lower densities on average than protostellar cores, with sizes that suggest density profiles substantially flatter than ρ ∝ r −2 . By contrast, starless cores in Serpens are compact and have lower masses than protostellar cores; future star formation will likely result in lower mass objects than the currently forming protostars. Comparison to dynamical masses estimated from the NH 3 survey of Perseus cores by Rosolowsky and coworkers suggests that most of the starless cores are likely to be gravitationally bound, and thus prestellar. The combined prestellar core mass distribution includes 108 cores and has a slope of α = − 2.3 ± 0.4 for M > 0.8 M ☉ . This slope is consistent with recent measurements of the stellar initial mass function, providing further evidence that stellar masses are directly linked to the core formation process. We place a lower limit on the core-to-star efficiency of 25%. There are approximately equal numbers of prestellar and protostellar cores in each cloud; thus the dense prestellar core lifetime must be similar to the lifetime of embedded protostars, or 4.5 × 10 5 yr, with a total uncertainty of a factor of 2. Such a short lifetime suggests a dynamic, rather than quasi-static, core evolution scenario, at least at the relatively high mean densities ( n > 2 × 10 4 cm −3 ) to which we are sensitive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/589963

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Enoch, M. L., Evans II, N. J., Sargent, A. I., Glenn, J., Rosolowsky, E., & Myers, P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-09-10
Volume
684
Issue
2
Pages
1240-1259
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2133991519
Cited by
319
References
0
FWCI
17.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mass Distribution and Lifetime of Prestellar Cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/589963
The paper
Enoch, M. L., Evans II, N. J., Sargent, A. I., Glenn, J., Rosolowsky, E., & Myers, P. (2008). The Mass Distribution and Lifetime of Prestellar Cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/589963

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.