The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Mass Distribution and Lifetime of Prestellar Cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus
Open accessAbstract
We present an unbiased census of starless cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus, assembled by comparing large-scale Bolocam 1.1 mm continuum emission maps with Spitzer c2d surveys. We use the c2d catalogs to separate 108 starless from 92 protostellar cores in the 1.1 mm core samples from Enoch and Young and their coworkers. A comparison of these populations reveals the initial conditions of the starless cores. Starless cores in Perseus have similar masses but larger sizes and lower densities on average than protostellar cores, with sizes that suggest density profiles substantially flatter than ρ ∝ r −2 . By contrast, starless cores in Serpens are compact and have lower masses than protostellar cores; future star formation will likely result in lower mass objects than the currently forming protostars. Comparison to dynamical masses estimated from the NH 3 survey of Perseus cores by Rosolowsky and coworkers suggests that most of the starless cores are likely to be gravitationally bound, and thus prestellar. The combined prestellar core mass distribution includes 108 cores and has a slope of α = − 2.3 ± 0.4 for M > 0.8 M ☉ . This slope is consistent with recent measurements of the stellar initial mass function, providing further evidence that stellar masses are directly linked to the core formation process. We place a lower limit on the core-to-star efficiency of 25%. There are approximately equal numbers of prestellar and protostellar cores in each cloud; thus the dense prestellar core lifetime must be similar to the lifetime of embedded protostars, or 4.5 × 10 5 yr, with a total uncertainty of a factor of 2. Such a short lifetime suggests a dynamic, rather than quasi-static, core evolution scenario, at least at the relatively high mean densities ( n > 2 × 10 4 cm −3 ) to which we are sensitive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“A turnover in the mass function appears at a mass about 3-4 times that seen in the stellar IMF (Alves et al. 2007; Enoch et al. 2008).”
BackgroundTHE SPITZER c2d LEGACY RESULTS: STAR-FORMATION RATES AND EFFICIENCIES; EVOLUTION AND LIFETIMES
Evans, N. J., Dunham, M. M., Jørgensen, J. K., Enoch, M. L., Merín, B., van Dishoeck, E. F., Alcalá, J. M., Myers, P. C., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Huard, T. L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321 · Cited by 1,649
Self-citationThe Chemical Composition of Comets—Emerging Taxonomies and Natal Heritage
Mumma, M. J., & Charnley, S. B. (2011) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130811 · Cited by 916
Metadata
- Authors
- Enoch, M. L., Evans II, N. J., Sargent, A. I., Glenn, J., Rosolowsky, E., & Myers, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2008-09-10
- Volume
- 684
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1240-1259
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2133991519
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mass Distribution and Lifetime of Prestellar Cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/589963
- The paper
- Enoch, M. L., Evans II, N. J., Sargent, A. I., Glenn, J., Rosolowsky, E., & Myers, P. (2008). The Mass Distribution and Lifetime of Prestellar Cores in Perseus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/589963
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.