The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AGN Dusty Tori. II. Observational Implications of Clumpiness
Open accessAbstract
Clumpy torus models with dusty clouds along radial equatorial rays successfully explain AGN infrared observations. The dust has standard Galactic composition, with individual cloud optical depth τ V ∼ 30–100 at visual. The models naturally explain the observed behavior of the 10 μm silicate feature, in particular the lack of deep absorption features in AGNs of any type, and can reproduce the weak emission feature tentatively detected in type 2 QSOs. The clouds' angular distribution must have a soft edge, e.g., Gaussian, and the radial distribution should decrease as 1/ r or 1/ r 2 . In line with recent interferometry, the ratio of the torus outer to inner radius can be as small as ~5-10. The models can produce nearly isotropic IR emission together with highly anisotropic obscuration, as required by observations. Clumpiness implies that the viewing angle determines an AGN classification only probabilistically; a source can display type 1 properties even from directions close to the equatorial plane. The fraction of obscured sources depends not only on the torus angular thickness but also on the cloud number , and this fraction's observed decrease with luminosity can be explained with a decrease of either parameter. X-ray obscuration, too, is probabilistic; resulting from both dusty and dust-free clouds, it might be dominated by the latter, giving rise to the observed QSOs that are X-ray obscured. Observations indicate that the torus and broad-line-emitting clouds form a seamless distribution, with the transition between the two caused by dust sublimation. Torus clouds may have been detected in the outflow component of H 2 O maser emission from two AGNs. Proper-motion measurements of outflow masers, especially in Circinus, are a promising method for probing the morphology and kinematics of torus clouds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Revisiting the Unified Model of Active Galactic Nuclei
Netzer, H. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302 · Cited by 865
Stellar Population Inference with Prospector
Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abef67 · Cited by 678
Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
García-Burillo, S., Combes, F., Usero, A., Aalto, S., Krips, M., Viti, S., Alonso-Herrero, A., Hunt, L. K., Schinnerer, E., Baker, A. J., et al. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423843 · Cited by 473
Mateos, S., Alonso-Herrero, A., Carrera, F. J., Blain, A., Watson, M. G., Barcons, X., Braito, V., Severgnini, P., Donley, J. L., & Stern, D. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21843.x · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Nenkova, M., Sirocky, M. M., Nikutta, R., Ivezić, Ž., & Elitzur, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2008-09-20
- Volume
- 685
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 160-180
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2048316219
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AGN Dusty Tori. II. Observational Implications of Clumpiness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/590483
- The paper
- Nenkova, M., Sirocky, M. M., Nikutta, R., Ivezić, Ž., & Elitzur, M. (2008). AGN Dusty Tori. II. Observational Implications of Clumpiness. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/590483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.