Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mergers and Mass Accretion Rates in Galaxy Assembly: The Millennium Simulation Compared to Observations of z≈ 2 Galaxies

Open access
Genel, Shy, Genzel, Reinhard, Bouché, Nicolas, Sternberg, Amiel, Naab, Thorsten, Schreiber, Natascha M. Förster, Shapiro, Kristen L., Tacconi, Linda J., Lutz, Dieter, Cresci, Giovanni, Buschkamp, Peter, Davies, Richard I., Hicks, Erin K. S.·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Recent observations of UV/optically selected, massive star-forming galaxies at z ≈ 2 indicate that the baryonic mass assembly and star formation history is dominated by continuous rapid accretion of gas and internal secular evolution, rather than by major mergers. We use the Millennium Simulation to build new halo merger trees and extract halo merger fractions and mass accretion rates. We find that, even for halos not undergoing major mergers, the mass accretion rates are plausibly sufficient to account for the high star formation rates observed in z ≈ 2 disks. On the other hand, the fraction of major mergers in the Millennium Simulation is sufficient to account for the number counts of submillimeter galaxies (SMGs), in support of observational evidence that these are major mergers. When following the fate of these two populations in the Millennium Simulation to z = 0, we find that subsequent mergers are not frequent enough to convert all z ≈ 2 turbulent disks into elliptical galaxies at z = 0. Similarly, mergers cannot transform the compact SMGs/red sequence galaxies at z ≈ 2 into observed massive cluster ellipticals at z = 0. We argue therefore, that secular and internal evolution must play an important role in the evolution of a significant fraction of z ≈ 2 UV/optically and submillimeter-selected galaxy populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/592241

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Genel, S., Genzel, R., Bouché, N., Sternberg, A., Naab, T., Schreiber, N. M. F., Shapiro, K. L., Tacconi, L. J., Lutz, D., Cresci, G., Buschkamp, P., Davies, R. I., & Hicks, E. K. S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-12
Volume
688
Issue
2
Pages
789-793
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1972443998
Cited by
164
References
2
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mergers and Mass Accretion Rates in Galaxy Assembly: The Millennium Simulation Compared to Observations of z≈ 2 Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/592241
The paper
Genel, S., Genzel, R., Bouché, N., Sternberg, A., Naab, T., Schreiber, N. M. F., Shapiro, K. L., Tacconi, L. J., Lutz, D., Cresci, G., Buschkamp, P., Davies, R. I., & Hicks, E. K. S. (2008). Mergers and Mass Accretion Rates in Galaxy Assembly: The Millennium Simulation Compared to Observations of z≈ 2 Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/592241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.