Cited by 7Biblical Studies and InterpretationStudy and Philosophy of ReligionKarl Barth and Christian Theology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Universal and the Particular: Mary Douglas and the Politics of Impurity* * Mary Douglas, In the Wilderness. (1993; rev. ed., London: Oxford, 2001);Mary Douglas, Leviticus as Literature. (Oxford: Oxford University, 1999);Mary Douglas, Jacob’s Tears: The Priestly Work of Reconciliation. (Oxford: Oxford University, 2004).

Lemos, T. M.·2009·The Journal of Religion

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/596070

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain types of women were sexually unavailable in ancient India; one category comprised those 'guarded' by another man, whether father, husband, or son.

    “Certain types of women were sexually unavailable in ancient India. One category of sexually unavailable women comprised those ' guarded ' ( raks ̣ it ā , gupt ā ) by another man, whether father, husband, or son.”
  • The presence of the household cloth, guarding monastic bhagas, may signal nuns' sexual unavailability, especially in a public setting.

    “Similarly, the presence of the household cloth, guarding monastic bhagas , as it were, may signal nuns ' sexual unavailability, especially in a public setting. 34”
  • According to traditions like the Kāmasūtra, female ascetics were to be categorized with sexually available women.

    “According to traditions like the K ā mas ū tra , female ascetics were to be categorized with sexually available women.”
  • Many Vinaya prescriptions place the nuns' community under the guardianship and control of the monks' community, indicating that Buddhist monks regarded themselves, however unwillingly, as guardians of monastic women.

    “Though the many Vinaya prescriptions that place the nuns ' community under the guardianship and control of the monks ' community indicate that Buddhist monks regarded themselves, however unwillingly, as guardians of monastic women, it is likely that many in the ancient context thought of Buddhist nuns as ' unguarded, ' or at least as insufficiently guarded.”
  • It is likely that many in the ancient context thought of Buddhist nuns as 'unguarded,' or at least as insufficiently guarded.

    “it is likely that many in the ancient context thought of Buddhist nuns as ' unguarded, ' or at least as insufficiently guarded.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.4324/9780203361832 · DOI
  2. Leviticus as Literature, Douglas writes, "In this
  3. Oden Robert A., 1987, New Voices in Biblical Studies
  4. Jones Gareth, 2004, The Blackwell Companion to Modern Theology (Malden
  5. Budd Philip, 1996, Eerdmans, 26
  6. Klawans Jonathan, 2006, Oxford, 18
  7. Klawans Jonathan, 2000, Oxford, 4
  8. Douglas Mary, 1975, Deciphering a Meal
  9. Budd Philip, 1984, Word Biblical Commentary 5 (Waco
  10. Douglas Mary, 1996, John F. A. Sawyer
  11. Since the priestly writer is freely credited with being the final editor
  12. Purity It, The Abominations of Leviticus
  13. See, 2000, Saul M. Olyan, Rites and Rank
  14. 10.1093/jts/52.2.722 · DOI
  15. Hayes Christine, 2002, Oxford, 19
  16. Lev., 15, 16
  17. 10, 36:17
  18. Lamb Sarah, 2005, Dirt, Undress, and Difference: Critical Perspectives on the Body's Surface, ed. Adeline Masquelier
  19. Choksy Jamsheed K., 1989, Purity and Pollution in Zoroastrianism (Austin: University of Texas Press
  20. In, (in her Implicit Meanings, 276, 282
  21. Katz Marion Holmes, 2002, Body of Text: The Emergence of the Sunni- Law of Ritual Purity (Albany: SUNY Press
  22. There, touching
  23. Katz, 1999, Body of Text, 187-206
  24. Marcus Julie, 1992, A World of Difference: Islam and Gender Hierarchy in Turkey (London: Zed
  25. Delaney Carol, 1988, Blood Magic: The Anthropology of Menstruation, ed. Thomas Buckley and Alma Gottlieb
  26. Lamb, 2000, Politics of Dirt
  27. Puri Jyoti, 1990, McKim Marriott (New Delhi: Sage, 1
  28. Pollution Purity, 2004, Zoroastrian Rituals in Context (Leiden: Brill
  29. 10.3998/mpub.6773 · DOI
  30. Milgrom Jacob, 1991, Anchor Bible Commentary Series 3 (New York: Doubleday
  31. It, punishing theodicy
  32. Bourdieu Pierre, 1988, trans. Peter Collier (Stanford
  33. Mary Douglas Richard Fardon's, 1999, An Intellectual Biography (London: Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lemos, T. M.
Affiliations
Miami University (US)
Corresponding author
Lemos, T. M.
Venue
The Journal of Religion
Published
2009-04
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
236-251
ISSN
  • 0022-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-6538
OpenAlex
W2273784380
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Keywords
Mary Douglas, impurities, Leviticus, reconciliation, ritual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review