The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Universal and the Particular: Mary Douglas and the Politics of Impurity* * Mary Douglas, In the Wilderness. (1993; rev. ed., London: Oxford, 2001);Mary Douglas, Leviticus as Literature. (Oxford: Oxford University, 1999);Mary Douglas, Jacob’s Tears: The Priestly Work of Reconciliation. (Oxford: Oxford University, 2004).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Certain types of women were sexually unavailable in ancient India; one category comprised those 'guarded' by another man, whether father, husband, or son.
“Certain types of women were sexually unavailable in ancient India. One category of sexually unavailable women comprised those ' guarded ' ( raks ̣ it ā , gupt ā ) by another man, whether father, husband, or son.”
From Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism (2015) · cites this paper as [34]
The presence of the household cloth, guarding monastic bhagas, may signal nuns' sexual unavailability, especially in a public setting.
“Similarly, the presence of the household cloth, guarding monastic bhagas , as it were, may signal nuns ' sexual unavailability, especially in a public setting. 34”
From Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism (2015) · cites this paper as [34]
According to traditions like the Kāmasūtra, female ascetics were to be categorized with sexually available women.
“According to traditions like the K ā mas ū tra , female ascetics were to be categorized with sexually available women.”
From Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism (2015) · cites this paper as [34]
Many Vinaya prescriptions place the nuns' community under the guardianship and control of the monks' community, indicating that Buddhist monks regarded themselves, however unwillingly, as guardians of monastic women.
“Though the many Vinaya prescriptions that place the nuns ' community under the guardianship and control of the monks ' community indicate that Buddhist monks regarded themselves, however unwillingly, as guardians of monastic women, it is likely that many in the ancient context thought of Buddhist nuns as ' unguarded, ' or at least as insufficiently guarded.”
From Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism (2015) · cites this paper as [34]
It is likely that many in the ancient context thought of Buddhist nuns as 'unguarded,' or at least as insufficiently guarded.
“it is likely that many in the ancient context thought of Buddhist nuns as ' unguarded, ' or at least as insufficiently guarded.”
From Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism (2015) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
Jews, Judaeans, Judaizing, Judaism: Problems of Categorization in Ancient History
Mason, S. (2007) · Journal for the Study of Judaism · doi:10.1163/156851507x193108 · Cited by 359
The idea of purity in ancient Judaism
NEUSNER, J. (1975) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/xliii.1.15 · Cited by 105
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.4324/9780203361832 · DOI
- Leviticus as Literature, Douglas writes, "In this
- Oden Robert A., 1987, New Voices in Biblical Studies
- Jones Gareth, 2004, The Blackwell Companion to Modern Theology (Malden
- Budd Philip, 1996, Eerdmans, 26
- Klawans Jonathan, 2006, Oxford, 18
- Klawans Jonathan, 2000, Oxford, 4
- Douglas Mary, 1975, Deciphering a Meal
- Budd Philip, 1984, Word Biblical Commentary 5 (Waco
- Douglas Mary, 1996, John F. A. Sawyer
- Since the priestly writer is freely credited with being the final editor
- Purity It, The Abominations of Leviticus
- See, 2000, Saul M. Olyan, Rites and Rank
- 10.1093/jts/52.2.722 · DOI
- Hayes Christine, 2002, Oxford, 19
- Lev., 15, 16
- 10, 36:17
- Lamb Sarah, 2005, Dirt, Undress, and Difference: Critical Perspectives on the Body's Surface, ed. Adeline Masquelier
- Choksy Jamsheed K., 1989, Purity and Pollution in Zoroastrianism (Austin: University of Texas Press
- In, (in her Implicit Meanings, 276, 282
- Katz Marion Holmes, 2002, Body of Text: The Emergence of the Sunni- Law of Ritual Purity (Albany: SUNY Press
- There, touching
- Katz, 1999, Body of Text, 187-206
- Marcus Julie, 1992, A World of Difference: Islam and Gender Hierarchy in Turkey (London: Zed
- Delaney Carol, 1988, Blood Magic: The Anthropology of Menstruation, ed. Thomas Buckley and Alma Gottlieb
- Lamb, 2000, Politics of Dirt
- Puri Jyoti, 1990, McKim Marriott (New Delhi: Sage, 1
- Pollution Purity, 2004, Zoroastrian Rituals in Context (Leiden: Brill
- 10.3998/mpub.6773 · DOI
- Milgrom Jacob, 1991, Anchor Bible Commentary Series 3 (New York: Doubleday
- It, punishing theodicy
- Bourdieu Pierre, 1988, trans. Peter Collier (Stanford
- Mary Douglas Richard Fardon's, 1999, An Intellectual Biography (London: Routledge
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism
Paris Langenberg, A. (2015) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfv059 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemos, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lemos, T. M.
- ORCID
- Lemos, T. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Religion
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-251
- ISSN
- 0022-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-6538
- OpenAlex
- W2273784380
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Religion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Keywords
- Mary Douglas, impurities, Leviticus, reconciliation, ritual
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review