Cited by 309Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Initial Low‐Dose Gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis Is Nephrotoxic

Cosgrove, Sara E., Vigliani, Gloria A., Campion, Marilyn, Fowler, Jr., Vance G., Abrutyn, Elias, Corey, G. Ralph, Levine, Donald P., Rupp, Mark E. +3 more·2009·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background.The safety of adding initial low-dose gentamicin to antistaphylococcal penicillins or vancomycin for treatment of suspected Staphylococcus aureus native valve endocarditis is unknown. This study evaluated the association between this practice and nephrotoxicity. Methods.We performed a prospective cohort study of safety data from a randomized, controlled trial of therapy for S. aureus bacteremia and native valve infective endocarditis involving 236 patients from 44 hospitals in 4 countries. Patients either received standard therapy (antistaphylococcal penicillin or vancomycin) plus initial low-dose gentamicin (n=116) or received daptomycin monotherapy (n=120). We measured renal adverse events and clinically significant decreased creatinine clearance in patients (1) in the original randomized study arms and (2) who received any initial low-dose gentamicin either, as a study medication or <2 days before enrollment. Results.Renal adverse events occurred in 8 (7%) of 120 daptomycin recipients, 10 (19%) of 53 vancomycin recipients, and 11 (17%) of 63 antistaphylococcal penicillin recipients. Decreased creatinine clearance occurred in 9 (8%) of 113 of evaluable daptomycin recipients, 10 (22%) of 46 vancomycin recipients, and 16 (25%) of 63 antistaphylococcal penicillin recipients. An additional 21 patients received initial low-dose gentamicin <2 days before study enrollment. A total of 22% of patients who received initial low-dose gentamicin versus 8% of patients who did not receive initial low-dose gentamicin experienced decreased creatinine clearance (P=.005). Independent predictors of a clinically significant decrease in creatinine clearance were age ⩾65 years and receipt of any initial low-dose gentamicin. Conclusions.Initial low-dose gentamicin as part of therapy for S. aureus bacteremia and native valve infective endocarditis is nephrotoxic and should not be used routinely, given the minimal existing data supporting its benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/597031

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 309

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, et al. Infective endocarditis: di- agnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheu- matic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardio- vascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association. Circulation 2005; 111:e394-434.
  2. [17]17. Wilhelm MP, Estes L. Symposium on antimicrobial agents, part XII: vancomycin. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74:928-35.
  3. [18]18. Wright AJ. The penicillins. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74:290-307.

Authors
Cosgrove, S. E., Vigliani, G. A., Campion, M., Fowler, Jr., Abrutyn, E., Corey, G. R., Levine, D. P., Rupp, M. E., Chambers, H. F., Karchmer, A. W., & Boucher, H. W.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Cosgrove, Sara E.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2009-03-15
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
713-721
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2129266432
Cited by
309
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
21.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Astellas Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
gentamicin, nephrotoxicity, Staphylococcus aureus, bacteremia, infective endocarditis, native valve endocarditis, daptomycin, vancomycin, renal adverse effects, creatinine clearance, drug safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Creatinine, Drug Therapy, Combination, Endocarditis, Bacterial, Female, Gentamicins, Humans, Kidney, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Penicillins, Prospective Studies, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin, Cohort Studies, Bacteremia, Daptomycin, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review