The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Screening for Cryptococcal Antigenemia in Patients Accessing an Antiretroviral Treatment Program in South Africa
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptococcal meningitis is a leading cause of death in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and contributes substantially to the high early mortality in antiretroviral treatment (ART) programs in low-resource settings. Screening for cryptococcal antigen in patients who enroll in ART programs may identify those at risk of cryptococcal meningitis and permit targeted use of preemptive therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, cryptococcal antigen was measured in stored plasma samples obtained from patients when they enrolled in a well-characterized ART cohort in South Africa. The predictive value of screening for cryptococcal antigen before initiation of ART for development of microbiologically confirmed cryptococcal meningitis or death during the first year of follow-up was determined. RESULTS: Of 707 participants with a baseline median CD4 cell count of 97 cells/microL (interquartile range, 46-157 cells/microL), 46 (7%) were positive for cryptococcal antigen. Antigenemia was 100% sensitive for predicting development of cryptococcal meningitis during the first year of ART, and in multivariate analysis, it was an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-6.6). Most cases (92%) of cryptococcal meningitis developed in patients with a CD4 cell count or 1:8 was 100% sensitive and 96% specific for predicting incident cryptococcal meningitis during the first year of ART in those with no history of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Cryptococcal antigen screening before initiation of ART in patients with a CD4 cell count
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Perfect, J. R., Dismukes, W. E., Dromer, F., Goldman, D. L., Graybill, J. R., Hamill, R. J., Harrison, T. S., Larsen, R. A., Lortholary, O., Nguyen, M.-H., et al. (2010) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/649858 · Cited by 2,660
Self-citationGlobal burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis
Rajasingham, R., Smith, R. M., Park, B. J., Jarvis, J. N., Govender, N. P., Chiller, T. M., Denning, D. W., Loyse, A., & Boulware, D. R. (2017) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30243-8 · Cited by 1,861
Self-citationMaziarz, E. K., & Perfect, J. R. (2016) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.006 · Cited by 698
Limper, A. H., Adenis, A., Le, T., & Harrison, T. S. (2017) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30303-1 · Cited by 472
Self-citationJarvis, J. N., Bicanic, T., Loyse, A., Namarika, D., Jackson, A., Nussbaum, J. C., Longley, N., Muzoora, C., Phulusa, J., Taseera, K., et al. (2014) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit794 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jarvis, J. N., Lawn, S. D., Vogt, M., Bangani, N., Wood, R., & Harrison, T. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 856-862
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2139368207
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for Cryptococcal Antigenemia in Patients Accessing an Antiretroviral Treatment Program in South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/597262
- The paper
- Jarvis, J. N., Lawn, S. D., Vogt, M., Bangani, N., Wood, R., & Harrison, T. S. (2009). Screening for Cryptococcal Antigenemia in Patients Accessing an Antiretroviral Treatment Program in South Africa. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/597262
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.