Cited by 63Physiological and biochemical adaptationsComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Running for Your Life or Running for Your Dinner: What Drives Fiber‐Type Evolution in Lizard Locomotor Muscles?

Scales, Jeffrey A., King, Aaron A., Butler, Marguerite A.·2009·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Despite its role in whole-animal performance, the adaptation of muscle physiology related to terrestrial locomotion remains underexplored. We tested evolutionary models based on predator escape and foraging strategies of lizards to assess whether fiber-type composition of a leg muscle is adaptive for behavior. The best-fitting model for fast-twitch fiber-type evolution was one based on predator-escape strategy, while the foraging-mode model fared poorly (Akaike Information Criterion with small sample size correction; DeltaAICc=29.7). According to the predator-escape model, lizards relying on sprints to avoid predators are predicted to have relatively higher proportions of fast glycolytic (FG) fibers (70%), while cryptic lizards are predicted to have relatively higher fast oxidative glycolytic (FOG) fiber proportions (77%). This pattern suggests an evolutionary trend toward greater FG (FOG) fiber composition among lizards that specialize in sprinting (crypsis). The best-fitting model for slow-twitch fibers had a single optimum, suggesting a common selective pressure across these lizards. The second-best model explaining slow-twitch fiber-type evolution was Brownian motion (DeltaAICc=0.80), indicating some support for neutral evolution. We find evidence suggesting that different fiber types occurring in the same muscle can evolve under different evolutionary pressures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/597613

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scales et al. found strong support for the predator escape hypothesis, which is 13.0 AICc units better than the next closest model, FMPE.

    “After fitting the multioptimum OU models to the muscle fiber data, they find strong support for the PE hypothesis, which is 13.0 Akaike's Information Criterion (AICc) units better than the next closest model (FMPE).”

    From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Scales et al. 2009

  • The conclusions of Scales et al. (2009) hold up, even when accommodating evolutionary regime shifts unrelated to the factors being considered, although the weight of evidence appears larger than it actually is.

    “Therefore, the conclusions of Scales et al. (2009) hold up, even when accommodating evolutionary regime shifts unrelated to the factors being considered, although the weight of evidence appears to be larger than it actually is.”

    From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Scales et al. (2009)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scales, J. A., King, A. A., & Butler, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
2009-05
Volume
173
Issue
5
Pages
543-553
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2005713919
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Michigan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
fast-twitch fibers, type I muscle fibers, predator escape, foraging strategies, cryptic behavior, sprinting, fast glycolytic fibers, fast oxidative glycolytic fibers, terrestrial locomotion, evolutionary models, neutral evolution
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Animals, Escape Reaction, Biological Evolution, Feeding Behavior, Lizards, Models, Biological, Motor Activity, Selection, Genetic, Muscle, Skeletal, Genetic Drift

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review