Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 524

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized, Double‐Blind, Phase 2a Trial of Falciparum Malaria Vaccines RTS,S/AS01B and RTS,S/AS02A in Malaria‐Naive Adults: Safety, Efficacy, and Immunologic Associates of Protection

Open access
Kester, Kent E., Cummings, James F., Ofori‐Anyinam, Opokua, Ockenhouse, Christian F., Krzych, Urszula, Moris, Philippe, Schwenk, Robert, Nielsen, Robin A., Debebe, Zufan, Pinelis, Evgeny, Juompan, Laure, Williams, Jack, Dowler, Megan, Stewart, V. Ann, Wirtz, Robert A., Dubois, Marie‐Claude, Lievens, Marc, Cohen, Joe, Ballou, W. Ripley, Heppner, Jr., D. Gray, RTS,S Vaccine Evaluation Group·2009·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To further increase the efficacy of malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS02A, we tested the RTS,S antigen formulated using the AS01B Adjuvant System (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals). METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized trial, 102 healthy volunteers were evenly allocated to receive RTS,S/AS01B or RTS,S/AS02A vaccine at months 0, 1, and 2 of the study, followed by malaria challenge. Protected vaccine recipients were rechallenged 5 months later. RESULTS: RTS,S/AS01B and RTS,S/AS02A were well tolerated and were safe. The efficacy of RTS,S/AS01B and RTS,S/AS02A was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.9%-67.1%) and 32% (95% CI, 17.6%-47.6%), respectively. At the time of initial challenge, the RTS,S/AS01B group had greater circumsporozoite protein (CSP)-specific immune responses, including higher immunoglobulin (Ig) G titers, higher numbers of CSP-specific CD4(+) T cells expressing 2 activation markers (interleukin-2, interferon [IFN]-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, or CD40L), and more ex vivo IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospots (ELISPOTs) than did the RTS,S/AS02A group. Protected vaccine recipients had a higher CSP-specific IgG titer (geometric mean titer, 188 vs 73 mug/mL; P < .001), higher numbers of CSP-specific CD4(+) T cells per 10(6) CD4(+) T cells (median, 963 vs 308 CSP-specific CD4(+) T cells/10(6) CD4(+) T cells; P < .001), and higher numbers of ex vivo IFN-gamma ELISPOTs (mean, 212 vs 96 spots/million cells; P < .001). At rechallenge, 4 of 9 vaccine recipients in each group were still completely protected. CONCLUSIONS: The RTS,S/AS01B malaria vaccine warrants comparative field trials with RTS,S/AS02A to determine the best formulation for the protection of children and infants. The association between complete protection and immune responses is a potential tool for further optimization of protection. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00075049.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/600120

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 524

Metadata

Authors
Kester, K. E., Cummings, J. F., Ofori‐Anyinam, O., Ockenhouse, C. F., Krzych, U., Moris, P., Schwenk, R., Nielsen, R. A., Debebe, Z., Pinelis, E., Juompan, L., Williams, J., Dowler, M., Stewart, V. A., Wirtz, R. A., Dubois, M., Lievens, M., Cohen, J., Ballou, W. R., Heppner, Jr., & RTS, S. V. E. G.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2009-08
Volume
200
Issue
3
Pages
337-346
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2163861382
Cited by
524
References
1
FWCI
32.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized, Double‐Blind, Phase 2a Trial of Falciparum Malaria Vaccines RTS,S/AS01B and RTS,S/AS02A in Malaria‐Naive Adults: Safety, Efficacy, and Immunologic Associates of Protection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/600120
The paper
Kester, K. E., Cummings, J. F., Ofori‐Anyinam, O., Ockenhouse, C. F., Krzych, U., Moris, P., Schwenk, R., Nielsen, R. A., Debebe, Z., Pinelis, E., Juompan, L., Williams, J., Dowler, M., Stewart, V. A., Wirtz, R. A., Dubois, M., Lievens, M., Cohen, J., Ballou, W. R., . . . RTS, S. V. E. G. (2009). Randomized, Double‐Blind, Phase 2a Trial of Falciparum Malaria Vaccines RTS,S/AS01B and RTS,S/AS02A in Malaria‐Naive Adults: Safety, Efficacy, and Immunologic Associates of Protection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/600120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.