Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carbon 13 in Plants and the Relationships between Carbon 13 and Carbon 14 Variations in Nature

Craig, Harmon·1954·The Journal of Geology

Abstract

In considering variations in the radiocarbon content of natural material, it is important to distinguish between processes of fractionation and of dilution; thus the accumulated data on C13 variations can be useful if correctly interpreted. In this paper the mechanism of the isotopic fractionation in plants is discussed, in an attempt to evaluate the relative effects of the local environment and of the activities of the plants themselves. It is shown that "cyclic enrichment processes" have had no effect on the isotopic composition of the various groups of plants. The relationships between C13 and C14 variations in depositional processes of carbonaceous materials are discussed with respect to the relative enrichment of these isotopes in carbonates, and an estimated "age" is derived for the carbon in the ocean. The established ranges of C13 concentration in the various types of carbonaceous materials allow accurate estimates to be made of the errors which can be introduced in radiocarbon dating by natural isotopic fractionation and the processes of chemical and bacterial decay. Some 30 new C13 analyses of carbonate and plant samples are given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/626141

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Craig, H.
Venue
The Journal of Geology
Published
1954-03
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
115-149
ISSN
  • 0022-1376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5269
OpenAlex
W1984498606
Cited by
425
References
0
FWCI
43.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon 13 in Plants and the Relationships between Carbon 13 and Carbon 14 Variations in Nature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/626141
The paper
Craig, H. (1954). Carbon 13 in Plants and the Relationships between Carbon 13 and Carbon 14 Variations in Nature. The Journal of Geology. https://doi.org/10.1086/626141

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.