The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Analysis of Two-Dimensional Orientation Data
Abstract
It is often useful to measure and analyze the orientations of various geological features-fabric elements, structural features, etc. Such measurements are more easily interpreted if they are summarized by statistics representing: (1) a preferred orientation direction, (2) the degree of preferred orientation, and (3) the probability that the preferred orientation is real and not merely due to chance. Application of conventional linear statistical methods, such as are used for grain-size analyses, presents some difficult problems, because orientation data are in the form of circular frequency distributions. A method of analysis which avoids these difficulties is discussed in this paper. A logical approach to the problem is to treat the distribution directly in its circular form rather than to divide it into a linear frequency distribution. This avoids the difficulty that the mean and standard deviation of such a distribution varies with the choice of origin or dividing point. A resultant vector is obtained for the circular distribution by treating each observation as a vector and summing components. The direction of this vector is the preferred orientation direction, and the vector magnitude is a measure of the dispersion, or degree of orientation. These descriptive statistics have the advantage that they are independent of any a priori reference direction or origin. An excellent correlation exists between vector mganitude and the standard deviation calculated around the vector direction. A test of the significance of the difference between an empirical orientation distribution and randomness is presented. Comparison shows that statistical significance is in many cases more easily attained with this test than with the chi-square and the F tests. Two empirical distributions with rather low vector magnitudes (high standard deviations), taken from sand-grain orientation studies, are tested for goodness of fit against several model distributions. The best fits appear to be the circular normal distribution and a distribution obtained by wrapping an unlimited linear normal curve around the center point of a polar co-ordinate plot.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Macrides, F., Eichenbaum, H., & Forbes, W. (1982) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.02-12-01705.1982 · Cited by 278
A small, physiological electric field orients cell division
Zhao, M., Forrester, J. V., & McCaig, C. D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.9.4942 · Cited by 186
Cresci, A., Durif, C. M., Paris, C. B., Thompson, C. R. S., Shema, S., Skiftesvik, A. B., & Browman, H. I. (2019) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.190812 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Curray, J. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Geology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1956-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-131
- ISSN
- 0022-1376 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5269
- OpenAlex
- W2042442912
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Analysis of Two-Dimensional Orientation Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/626329
- The paper
- Curray, J. R. (1956). The Analysis of Two-Dimensional Orientation Data. The Journal of Geology. https://doi.org/10.1086/626329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.